2018
DOI: 10.1177/0363546518786006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical Outcomes, Tendon Integrity, and Shoulder Strength After Revision Rotator Cuff Reconstruction: A Minimum 2 Years’ Follow-up

Abstract: Revision RCR improves clinical outcomes and shoulder function at midterm follow-up. The clinical outcome scores were comparable in patients with an intact repair and those with failed RC healing. Therefore, tendon integrity was not correlated with better clinical outcomes after revision RCR at final follow-up.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean preoperative functional scores of affected shoulders were 43 ± 24 (CS), respectively 35 ± 17 (ASES), being in line with the previous reports . At six months follow‐up, the mean shoulder function significantly improved to 68 ± 25 (CS), respectively, 71 ± 24 (ASES).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Mean preoperative functional scores of affected shoulders were 43 ± 24 (CS), respectively 35 ± 17 (ASES), being in line with the previous reports . At six months follow‐up, the mean shoulder function significantly improved to 68 ± 25 (CS), respectively, 71 ± 24 (ASES).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The high retear rate after rRCR in the current study (50%) is similar to that reported in previous original studies, ranging from 40% to 55.5%. 19,36,41 Brochin et al, 2 in a systematic review, analyzed 9 studies for outcomes after arthroscopic rRCR and reported a retear rate of 13.7% (range, 0%-48%). 2 Another important finding of this study was that the retear rate after revision surgery was not different from that after the primary repair done for mRCTs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We report a retear rate of 57% in revision, 2-tendon repairs augmented with dermal allografts. When evaluating revision repairs of all sizes, Willinger et al 33 reported a retear rate of 56% and Shamsudin et al 29 reported a retear rate of 40% without graft augmentation. 29,33 When specifically evaluating 2-tendon, revision repairs, Keener et al 17 reported a retear rate of 73%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When evaluating revision repairs of all sizes, Willinger et al 33 reported a retear rate of 56% and Shamsudin et al 29 reported a retear rate of 40% without graft augmentation. 29,33 When specifically evaluating 2-tendon, revision repairs, Keener et al 17 reported a retear rate of 73%. Data on revision rotator cuff repair augmented with human dermal allograft are limited to a study by Hohn et al 14 The authors evaluated all revision repairs .2 cm and reported a retear rate of 31%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%