1986
DOI: 10.1016/0165-2427(86)90078-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical, pathological and serological features of spontaneous canine leptospirosis. An evaluation of the IgM- and IgG-specific ELISA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
16
0
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It suggests that the younger animals play a particularly important part in the epidemiology of infection. It confirms other published results [28,29] which showed that younger dogs are more severely affected by leptospirosis than older dogs. However, a different situation was observed for serovars Grippotyphosa and Mozdok for which the risk of infection was greater in older (>10 years) and middle-aged (6-9 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…It suggests that the younger animals play a particularly important part in the epidemiology of infection. It confirms other published results [28,29] which showed that younger dogs are more severely affected by leptospirosis than older dogs. However, a different situation was observed for serovars Grippotyphosa and Mozdok for which the risk of infection was greater in older (>10 years) and middle-aged (6-9 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…A high IgM in combination with a low IgG titre was diagnostic in 15 dogs in this study. This combination is highly suggestive of an acute infection (Hartmann and others 1986). The IFA is, however, not able to distinguish between different serogroups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a report that among ten dogs with natural acute leptospiral infection and concomitant finding of positive IgM and IgG specific antibodies, only two of them survived 12 . The finding of concomitant IgG and IgM presence in acute disease in these dogs suggests either reinfection or a long period elapsed since vaccination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%