2016
DOI: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20161382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical profile of refractive errors in children in a tertiary care hospital of Northern India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
31
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
31
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were reported in hospital-based study done by Mittal et al in Uttarakhand and Matta et al in New Delhi. 13,14 In population-based studies done by Dulani et al in Jaipur, Pavithra et al in Bangalore and Prema et al in Tamil Nadu females were reported to be more affected, which is contrary to this study. [15][16][17] Mittal et al postulated that the possible cause of this difference may be ignorance towards the needs of female child or may be due to the social stigma associated with spectacle use in females.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Similar results were reported in hospital-based study done by Mittal et al in Uttarakhand and Matta et al in New Delhi. 13,14 In population-based studies done by Dulani et al in Jaipur, Pavithra et al in Bangalore and Prema et al in Tamil Nadu females were reported to be more affected, which is contrary to this study. [15][16][17] Mittal et al postulated that the possible cause of this difference may be ignorance towards the needs of female child or may be due to the social stigma associated with spectacle use in females.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…[15][16][17] Mittal et al postulated that the possible cause of this difference may be ignorance towards the needs of female child or may be due to the social stigma associated with spectacle use in females. 13 In this study the average age of presentation was 10.5±6. Uttarkhand,13 where the average age of presentation was found to be 10.90±3.16 years and by Kalikivayi et al in Hyderabad (9.3±3.4 years).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations