2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11726-016-0960-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical studies on different acupuncture time for primary dysmenorrhea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The outcomes of the current study are in line with those of other studies in this field. For example, Wahdi et al (40) revealed that applying acupressure to the Hugo point can reduce the severity of menstruation pain (41). The efficacy of different acupuncture times for primary dysmenorrhea was explored, and it was concluded that acupuncture has a favorable effect on alleviating primary dysmenorrhea pain (30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcomes of the current study are in line with those of other studies in this field. For example, Wahdi et al (40) revealed that applying acupressure to the Hugo point can reduce the severity of menstruation pain (41). The efficacy of different acupuncture times for primary dysmenorrhea was explored, and it was concluded that acupuncture has a favorable effect on alleviating primary dysmenorrhea pain (30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of bias for each included RCT was summarized in Figure 2 and Figure 3. For the random sequence generation, risk of bias for 11 RCTs [30,33,34,35,38,41,42,47,48,49,52] were rated as low and 12 RCTs [31,32,36,37,39,40,43,44,45,46,50,51] were rated as unclear. Only 3 RCTs [33,35,48] mentioned allocation concealment, while the remaining researches did not mention allocation concealment.…”
Section: Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cure rate. Nineteen RCTs [30,31,32,28,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]47,50,51,52] showed a favorable effect of simple-needling in cure rate. Figure 4 showed the result of the meta-analysis (RR = 2.29, 95% CI [1.96,2.68], P < .00001)with low heterogeneity (P = .15, I 2 = 24%), and using fixed effect model.…”
Section: Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations