Clinical study to compare the effect of stannous fluoride and chlorhexidine mouthrinses on plaque formation

Helldén, Leif; Camosci, David; Hock, Janet M.; Tinanoff, Norman

doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.1981.tb02019.x

Cited by 17 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[2] Chlorhexidine (CHX) is the most studied and effective antiseptic for plaque inhibition and prevention of gingivitis when used twice daily as mouth rinse. [3] CHX besides its side effects including: Brown discoloration of the teeth, some restorative materials and mucosa; bitter taste and a slight increase in supragingival calculus formation is known as “Gold Standard” of antimicrobial rinses because of broad-spectrum activity and substantivity of 8–12 h.[45]…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The comparative effects of 0.12% chlorhexidine and herbal oral rinse on dental plaque-induced gingivitis: A randomized clinical trial

Bhate¹,

Jain²,

Kale³

et al. 2015

J Indian Soc Periodontol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:Chlorhexidine (CHX) is considered as a gold standard of antimicrobial rinses. Various herbal oral rinses are available in the market. However, little is known of its effectiveness.Aim:The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical changes after the usage of herbal oral rinse and 0.12% CHX.Materials and Methods:In a randomized clinical trial, 76 patients with dental plaque-induced gingivitis were assigned to Group I (Herbal Oral Rinse - Hiora®) and 76 patients with dental plaque-induced gingivitis to Group II (0.12% Chlorhexidine-Peridex®). Gingival index and Plaque index scores were recorded at baseline and 21 days after scaling.Results:Intragroup comparison in both groups showed that plaque index and gingival index scores were statistically significant after 21 days as compared to baseline. Intergroup comparison showed that plaque index scores and gingival index scores were statistically significant in Group II as compared to Group I.Conclusion:When herbal oral rinse was compared to 0.12% CHX, 0.12% CHX mouth rinse effectively reduced the clinical symptoms of plaque-induced gingivitis.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The comparative effects of 0.12% chlorhexidine and herbal oral rinse on dental plaque-induced gingivitis: A randomized clinical trial

Bhate¹,

Jain²,

Kale³

et al. 2015

J Indian Soc Periodontol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since the introduction of chlorhexidine in the plaque control in the early 70s, several alternative plaque inhibitors with clear-eut effect as compared with placebo have been tested (5)(6)(7)(8). However, when compared with chlorhexidine none has shown equal or better activity without also giving unacceptable side effects (9)(10)(11)(12). Also chlorhexidine has some unpleasant side effects restricting its general use (13)(14)(15).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of Veadent as a plaque‐inhibiting mouthwash

Abbas

Thrane

Othman

1985

European J Oral Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abbas DK, Thrane P, Othman SJ: Effectiveness of Veadent as a plaque-inhibiting mouthwash. Scand J Dent Res 1985; 93: 494-7. Abstract ~ The aim of this study was to compare the effect of the commercially available Veadent mouthwash and chlorhexidine on plaque formation. Plaque accumulating during two 5-day periods was recorded in a group of 10 students. During the experimental periods, the test subjects abstained from mechanical cleaning of the teeth, and chewed sucrose-containing chewing gum every 4th h in order to enhance plaque formation. They also rinsed with cither chlorhexidine or Veadent twice a day according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Chlorhexidine mouthrinses resulted in significantly lower plaque scores than did Veadent in the present shortterm model study..: '..•

show abstract

“…Studies have shown that CHX lack plaque inhibitory properties at lower concentrations. [ 16 ] Da Costa et al . [ 17 ] concluded that adjunctive use of CHX mouth rinse with mechanical SRP resulted in slightly greater PD reduction than did SRP alone.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of piper extract mouthwash as postprocedural rinse on levels of Porphyromonas gingivalis in periodontitis patients

Sundaram

Theagarajan²,

Murthy

et al. 2021

J Indian Soc Periodontol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Dental biofilm plays a crucial role in periodontal disease development. Mouth rinse is used to enhance oral hygiene after scaling and root planning (SRP). The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical and microbiological effectiveness of a piper extract mouthwash against Chlorhexidine (CHX) in periodontitis patients. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients with Stage II periodontitis participated in this study and were randomly divided into two groups (Group I – Stage II Grade A periodontitis patients were provided with prepared piper extract mouthwash and Group II – Stage II Grade A periodontitis patients were provided with 0.2% CHX). Plaque index, gingival index, sulcus bleeding index, probing pocket depth, and clinical attachment level were recorded at baseline and 30 days after SRP. Subgingival plaque samples were taken for microbial examination (colony-forming unit), quantification of Porphyromonas gingivalis using the real-time polymerase chain reaction at baseline, and 30 days after SRP. Results: Intragroup comparison for the clinical parameters showed statistically significant reduction in both the groups ( P < 0.0001). Intergroup comparison for clinical parameters, there was no statistical significance seen after 30 days. Intragroup comparison for microbial analysis showed significant reduction in both the groups after 30 days ( P < 0.0001). On intergroup comparison for microbial analysis, both the groups showed reduction after 30 days without significance. Conclusion: Piper extract mouthwash (Group I) showed similar antimicrobial activity against P. gingivalis when compared to 0.2% CHX mouthwash (Group II) that could be used as a substitute to CHX.

show abstract

Clinical study to compare the effect of stannous fluoride and chlorhexidine mouthrinses on plaque formation

Cited by 17 publications

References 13 publications

The comparative effects of 0.12% chlorhexidine and herbal oral rinse on dental plaque-induced gingivitis: A randomized clinical trial

The comparative effects of 0.12% chlorhexidine and herbal oral rinse on dental plaque-induced gingivitis: A randomized clinical trial

Effectiveness of Veadent as a plaque‐inhibiting mouthwash

Effect of piper extract mouthwash as postprocedural rinse on levels of Porphyromonas gingivalis in periodontitis patients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About