2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical SYNTAX score predicts outcomes of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The SYNTAX score of ≥33 points is widely accepted criteria to select coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) over PCI in treatment of the left main lesions. SYNTAX score of 22–32 points is defined as moderate complexity of coronary artery disease, both the CABG and PCI can be adopted [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SYNTAX score of ≥33 points is widely accepted criteria to select coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) over PCI in treatment of the left main lesions. SYNTAX score of 22–32 points is defined as moderate complexity of coronary artery disease, both the CABG and PCI can be adopted [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, in a different study, log CSS was also found to enhance risk stratification for 3‐year mortality after PCI compared with the SS 25 . Melina et al 26 showed log CSS was superior to SS in terms of predicting mortality and major adverse cardiac/cerebrovascular events in patients who underwent elective CABG. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first one that evaluates the predictive value and clinical utility of log CSS for in‐hospital mortality in STEMI patients undergoing emergent CABG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Приведенный анализ изучил влияние одной из шкал оценки тяжести поражения коронарного русла на внутрибольничную летальность в условиях реальной клинической практики и своевременно проведенной реперфузионной терапии. Индекс SYNTAX Score был выбран как валидизированный критерий оценки, поскольку хорошо изучен в литературе применительно к чрескожному коронарному вмешательству и коронарному шунтированию при ИМпST [7,22]. Практической значимостью нашего анализа может стать необходимость переоценки значимости индекса SYNTAX Score и проводимого лечения в группе больных с высоким баллом по SYNTAX Score [20][21][22].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified