2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clival Defect with Primary CSF Rhinorrhea: A Very Rare Presentation with Challenging Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of S-CSF-L of all CSF fistulas in any location is between 3 and 40% in the series [4][5][6][7]. S-CSF-L is usually observed at the cribriform plate of the skull base.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The prevalence of S-CSF-L of all CSF fistulas in any location is between 3 and 40% in the series [4][5][6][7]. S-CSF-L is usually observed at the cribriform plate of the skull base.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sphenoidal and, more specifically, clival localization is even less common [3]. S-CSF-L from the clivus is very rare, with few cases reported in the literature [6,7]. Meningitis is the most serious clinic complication in these cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 1 presents a detailed description of all the PCF SL patients. Table 1 does not include (a) nonspontaneous (iatrogenic, after surgery or radiotherapy, post-traumatic) PCF liquorrhea; 7,8 (b) spontaneous PCF pneumocephalus due to bone defects that did not manifest in the form of SL; [9][10][11] (c) PCF bone defects or encephalocele (herniation) not accompanied by SL (or if this fact was not mentioned in the report); 12,13 (d) clivus defects manifesting in the form of SL, which, in turn, also can be attributed to PCF defects, but we believe that such pathology requires individual analysis; 14,15 (e) literature reviews without specifying own experience of PCF SL treatment; 16 and (f) reports where a PCF defect was mentioned for the general group of SL patients, but that had no required observation data (age, sex, symptoms, defect location, approach, complications, and so forth) 3,17,18…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%