2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11227-016-1690-2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cloud service ranking as a multi objective optimization problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lack of the proper information and past experience of the CSPs leads the weak decision by the CSCs. Hence, many researchers [3,27,[34][35][36] have conducted a research to compare and evaluate the level of the services that user gain by the CSPs. For example, in a typical distributed environment [37], an agent (trustier) is acting in a domain where he needs to trust other agents or objects, whose ability and reliability are unknown.…”
Section: Trust Framework and Past Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of the proper information and past experience of the CSPs leads the weak decision by the CSCs. Hence, many researchers [3,27,[34][35][36] have conducted a research to compare and evaluate the level of the services that user gain by the CSPs. For example, in a typical distributed environment [37], an agent (trustier) is acting in a domain where he needs to trust other agents or objects, whose ability and reliability are unknown.…”
Section: Trust Framework and Past Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jahani and Khanli [15] have proposed a NSGA_SR method which models the cloud service ranking as a multi‐objective optimisation problem. The NSGA_SR method uses objective and subjective assessments.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jahani and Mohammad Khanli [29] (our earlier work) proposed a ranking system (NSGA SR) that can select some candidate services and rank them based on multi-objective optimization problem. This method is so useful and need less time than other methods in literature.…”
Section: A Jahani F Derakhshan L Mohammad Khanlimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that, except the approach offered by Rajkumar [6] and Jahani [29], other proposed methods do ranking based on limited attributes and they do not consider SMI attributes, in their ranking approach. In this way, user often searches for a service with special attributes which the ranking process do not perform ranking based on those attributes.…”
Section: A Jahani F Derakhshan L Mohammad Khanlimentioning
confidence: 99%