Clustering of fMRI data: the elusive optimal number of clusters

Abstract

Model-free methods are widely used for the processing of brain fMRI data collected under natural stimulations, sleep, or rest. Among them is the popular fuzzy c-mean algorithm, commonly combined with cluster validity (CV) indices to identify the ‘true’ number of clusters (components), in an unsupervised way. CV indices may however reveal different optimal c-partitions for the same fMRI data, and their effectiveness can be hindered by the high data dimensionality, the limited signal-to-noise ratio, the small proportion of relevant voxels, and the presence of artefacts or outliers. Here, the author investigated the behaviour of seven robust CV indices. A new CV index that incorporates both compactness and separation measures is also introduced. Using both artificial and real fMRI data, the findings highlight the importance of looking at the behavior of different compactness and separation measures, defined here as building blocks of CV indices, to depict a full description of the data structure, in particular when no agreement is found between CV indices. Overall, for fMRI, it makes sense to relax the assumption that only one unique c-partition exists, and appreciate that different c-partitions (with different optimal numbers of clusters) can be useful explanations of the data, given the hierarchical organization of many brain networks.

A multiomics approach to heterogeneity in Alzheimer’s disease: focused review and roadmap

“…An individual resting-state fMRI connectivity map can be generated for different networks, with the default-mode, limbic, and salience networks being the key components affected by Alzheimer's disease (Badhwar et al, 2017) (1b). Structural and functional brain maps enter a subtyping procedure, which identifies groups of individuals with homogeneous brain maps (1c).The number of subtypes are defined a priori or through various metrics for model selection (Seghier, 2018) (for example N=3 in 1c). A subtype map is generated by averaging the maps within each subgroup and subtracting the grand average (i.e.…”

Evaluation of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging under Artificial Intelligence Algorithm on Plan‐Do‐Check‐Action Home Nursing for Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy

“…In addition, the degree of kidney fibrosis was lower, and the diffusion of water molecules was even in images. As the improved FCM algorithm was applied to detect the fMRI activation regions, the detection result was closer to the confirmed state [14]. It proved that the in-hospital treatment controlled the deterioration of DN in patients, and the improved FCM algorithm could realize the analysis and processing of fMRI image data better.…”

A Multiomics Approach to Heterogeneity in Alzheimer’s Disease: Focused Review and Roadmap

“…An individual resting-state fMRI connectivity map can be generated for different networks, with the default-mode, limbic, and salience networks being the key components affected by Alzheimer’s disease (Badhwar et al ., 2017) (1b). Structural and functional brain maps enter a subtyping procedure, which identifies groups of individuals with homogeneous brain maps (1c).The number of subtypes are defined a priori or through various metrics for model selection (Seghier, 2018) (for example N=3 in 1c). A subtype map is generated by averaging the maps within each subgroup and subtracting the grand average (i.e.…”