2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(01)01517-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clustering with dendrograms on interpretation variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
77
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CA uses the information obtained from the measured variables to reveal the natural clusters existing between the studied samples [22]. The dendrogram shows (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CA uses the information obtained from the measured variables to reveal the natural clusters existing between the studied samples [22]. The dendrogram shows (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ward's method using euclidean distances as a measure of similarity (Willet 1987;Adams 1998;Otto 1998) within HACA has proved to be a very efficient method. The result is illustrated by a dendogram, presenting the clusters and their proximity (Forina et al 2002). The euclidean distance (linkage distance) is reported as D link /D max , which represents the quotient between the linkage distance divided by the maximal distance.…”
Section: The Data and Monitoring Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finding is clarified by a dendogram, giving the clusters and their closeness. 20 However, the Euclidean distance is reported as Dlink/D max , which represents the quotient between the linkages distances alienated by the highest distance. The quotient is commonly multiplied by 100 as a way to standardizing the linkage distance signified by the y-axis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%