2012
DOI: 10.1109/t-affc.2012.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Co-Adaptive and Affective Human-Machine Interface for Improving Training Performances of Virtual Myoelectric Forearm Prosthesis

Abstract: Abstract-The real-time adaptation between human and assistive devices can improve the quality of life for amputees, which, however, may be difficult to achieve since physical and mental states vary over time. This paper presents a co-adaptive humanmachine interface (HMI) that is developed to control virtual forearm prosthesis over a long period of operation. Direct physical performance measures for the requested tasks are calculated. Bioelectric signals are recorded using one pair of electrodes placed on the f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome difficulties associated with establishing and maintaining an efficient decoder despite limited neural recordings and changes in signal quality, closed-loop adaptation of the decoder are increasingly studied and used to complement subjects' adaptation in brain machine interface (Iturrate et al, 2015;Dangi et al, 2013;Orsborn et al, 2012;Shenoy and Carmena, 2014). As similar issues occur for myoelectric controls, co-adaptation strategies are starting to be explored there as well (Hahne et al, 2015;Rezazadeh et al, 2012;Tuga et al, 2013). In both situations, however, the dynamics of the concurrent adaptation of the human and machine needs to be carefully considered since it is likely to be complex and to greatly impact the effectiveness of particular co-adaptation settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome difficulties associated with establishing and maintaining an efficient decoder despite limited neural recordings and changes in signal quality, closed-loop adaptation of the decoder are increasingly studied and used to complement subjects' adaptation in brain machine interface (Iturrate et al, 2015;Dangi et al, 2013;Orsborn et al, 2012;Shenoy and Carmena, 2014). As similar issues occur for myoelectric controls, co-adaptation strategies are starting to be explored there as well (Hahne et al, 2015;Rezazadeh et al, 2012;Tuga et al, 2013). In both situations, however, the dynamics of the concurrent adaptation of the human and machine needs to be carefully considered since it is likely to be complex and to greatly impact the effectiveness of particular co-adaptation settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note, that we only can vary the parameter sets p HMI and p TE . The parameter set p H represents the mental model of the HMI in the human's brain [9]. It cannot be affected directly by our adaptation.…”
Section: Co-adaptive Training Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abundance of work has gone into the development of HMIs based on various kinds of biosignals such as hand prostheses [4,5,6]. However, comparatively little work has been done within the field of adaptive TEs and HMIs [7,8,9]. The characteristics can be adapted offline or online by a single-or multi-objective optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Force plays an important role in these applications. Rezazadeh et al [1] proposed a co-adaptive Human-Machine Interface (HMI) that is developed to control virtual forearm prosthesis over a long period of operation. This paper has influenced us to make a robotic arm based on the hand EMG signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%