2015
DOI: 10.15835/nbha4319881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coefficient of Variation Can Identify the Most Important Effects of Experimental Treatments

Abstract: Most agricultural experiments involve evaluation of multiple variables and at times it can be difficult to identify the biologically relevant effects of the experimental treatments after performing the traditional ANOVA, Tukey and t-tests. The coefficient of variation formula could be an important tool to focus ‘Result and Discussion’ sections only on the most important changes produced by the experimental treatments. This short report is intended to exemplify the use of the coefficient of variation in three p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this formula, we considered the average values of the three treatments compared (seed sizes) to calculate the standard deviation and average. Therefore, the higher the difference between the three materials compared, the higher the OCV (Lorenzo et al 2015). The OCVs were classi ed as Low from 1.73 to 24.42%, Medium from 24.42 to 47.11% and High from 47.11 to 69.79%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this formula, we considered the average values of the three treatments compared (seed sizes) to calculate the standard deviation and average. Therefore, the higher the difference between the three materials compared, the higher the OCV (Lorenzo et al 2015). The OCVs were classi ed as Low from 1.73 to 24.42%, Medium from 24.42 to 47.11% and High from 47.11 to 69.79%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this formula, we considered the average values of the four treatments to calculate the standard deviation and average. For this comparison, the larger the difference between the four treatments compared, the higher the OCV (Lorenzo et al 2015). The OCVs were classi ed as Low = 8.77 to 19.58%, Medium = 19.58 to 30.38% and High = 30.38 to 41.19%.…”
Section: Characterization Of Argovit™ Agnps Have Been Previously Repo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore need a relative way to determine the threshold for 𝐶𝑉 . It's been proved that classifying 𝐶𝑉 into high, medium and low is good enough [38,61] to leverage 𝐶𝑉 . We therefore equally divide the value range of a 𝐶𝑉 into three non-overlapped partitions, as shown in equation (4).…”
Section: Query Configuration Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%