2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-019-09506-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive assessment tools for mild cognitive impairment screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
89
0
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
7
89
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…FINS was assayed by the electrochemiluminescence method (Roche Elecsys Insulin kit; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). TG, TC, LDL-C and HDL-C were determined using enzymatic colorimetry by an automatic analyzer (Beckman AU5800, Tokyo, Japan) according to the standard protocol 29 . Insulin resistance was estimated based on the homoeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) formula: FBG (mmol/L) 9 FINS (mU/L) / 22.5.…”
Section: Blood Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FINS was assayed by the electrochemiluminescence method (Roche Elecsys Insulin kit; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). TG, TC, LDL-C and HDL-C were determined using enzymatic colorimetry by an automatic analyzer (Beckman AU5800, Tokyo, Japan) according to the standard protocol 29 . Insulin resistance was estimated based on the homoeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) formula: FBG (mmol/L) 9 FINS (mU/L) / 22.5.…”
Section: Blood Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies in mainland China suggested that the cutoffs for MCI were 24 in a clinical sample [ 8 ] and ranged from 18 to 25 in normative samples [ 9 11 ]. These studies suggested that the cutoffs were contingent upon sampling (i.e., normative versus clinical), age, education, cultural background, and validating criteria [ 12 ]. Such inconsistency and contingency cast doubt on whether seeking a single cutoff score is an accomplishable goal and whether an alternative procedure might shed new light on any cutoffs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a large variety of reference measures could lead to variations in cutoffs. For instance, sensitivity and specificity of the cutoff varied with the validating tools [ 12 ]. As such, there is no gold standard as to a cutoff score (i.e., validation criterion), as one scholar rather disappointingly stated: “There is no gold standard .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annual conversion rate from MCI to dementia is reportedly ∼10-15%, which is 10 times that in the normal population (1). Thus, MCI has been regarded as a crucial stage in which the long-term outcome of dementia may be improved if early diagnosis and intervention are achieved (2). MCI is commonly classified into two subtypes: amnestic MCI (aMCI) and non-amnestic MCI (naMCI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Great efforts have been made to explore diagnostic and screening tools for aMCI, such as psychological batteries (2,4,5), cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers (6), and molecular imaging approaches (7). These methods have their special strengths and limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%