2011
DOI: 10.1007/174_2011_433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collective Radiation Dose from MDCT: Critical Review of Surveys Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are likely not as accurate as doses based on a comprehensive assessment such as included in this report. Larger surveys are necessary to account for variations based on size and variations that may result from inclusion of a single or small number of scanners [25]. The recently published EUCLID study is also based on a large-scale survey that collected at least 20 CT examinations of standard-sized patients from each hospital for each EUCLID indication [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are likely not as accurate as doses based on a comprehensive assessment such as included in this report. Larger surveys are necessary to account for variations based on size and variations that may result from inclusion of a single or small number of scanners [25]. The recently published EUCLID study is also based on a large-scale survey that collected at least 20 CT examinations of standard-sized patients from each hospital for each EUCLID indication [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a third acquisition consisted of a thoracoabdominal scan, 60 s after the end of the second acquisition with the following parameters: tube potential, 120 kV; tube current from 40 to 150 mAs, depending on automatic tube current modulation. The effective delivered radiation dose was calculated as follows: dose-length product provided by the scanner unit multiplied by 0.017 [23]. The average radiation exposure delivered by ungated CT and ECG-gated CT acquisitions was 3.4 ± 0.9 mSv and 11.5 ± 1.8 mSv, respectively.…”
Section: Ecg-gated and Ungated Ctmentioning
confidence: 99%