2015
DOI: 10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Collocations in context

Abstract: The idea that text in a particular field of discourse is organized into lexical patterns, which can be visualized as networks of words that collocate with each other, was originally proposed by Phillips (1983). This idea has important theoretical implications for our understanding of the relationship between the lexis and the text and (ultimately) between the text and the discourse community/ the mind of the speaker. Although the approaches to date have offered different possibilities for constructing collocat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 410 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
92
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…For the purposes of analysis, all function words and personal names were removed from the list of collocates. In terms of the collocation parameter notation proposed by Brezina, McEnery, and Wattam (2015), these settings might be written as '3a+6a-MI(3)+LL(p<0.05), L5-R5, C1-NC3; function words and personal names removed'. The collocates were then categorised according to the most relevant WordNet domains (Bentivogli, Forner, Magnini, & Pianta, 2004), with the Spanish WordNet accessed through the multilingual lexical online database MultiWordNet 1.4.2 (Cendejas, Barceló, Sidorov, Gelbukh, & Chanona-Hernandez, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the purposes of analysis, all function words and personal names were removed from the list of collocates. In terms of the collocation parameter notation proposed by Brezina, McEnery, and Wattam (2015), these settings might be written as '3a+6a-MI(3)+LL(p<0.05), L5-R5, C1-NC3; function words and personal names removed'. The collocates were then categorised according to the most relevant WordNet domains (Bentivogli, Forner, Magnini, & Pianta, 2004), with the Spanish WordNet accessed through the multilingual lexical online database MultiWordNet 1.4.2 (Cendejas, Barceló, Sidorov, Gelbukh, & Chanona-Hernandez, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several text analytic tools has been developed providing convenient ways to simplify and reduce textual data dimensionality with the use of collocation networks (Brezina et al, 2015), cluster analysis, and multidimensional scaling (Cleophas & Zwinderman, 2015, pp. 3-46).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multi terms also can be identified by identifying terms collocation. The collocation will determine a sequence of terms that frequently appear more together than would be expected by chance collocation [20]. For example the noun Fire can be a collocation term when it occurs frequently with the term raging.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is considered as a phraseological perspective and from a frequency-based perspective [23]. Mostly, three criteria is used to identify collocations which is the distance, frequency and exclusivity [20]. The frequency identification is a simple method to determine the collocation of terms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new-GSL is a robust comparison of four language corpora (LOB, BNC, BE06, and EnTenTen12) of a total size of over 12 billion running words, compiled by Brezina and Gablasova (Brezina et al, 2015). The teaching materials used in the experimental group are selected and edited by manipulating the new-GSL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%