2007
DOI: 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.7.1035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA): Classification of Suicidal Events in the FDA’s Pediatric Suicidal Risk Analysis of Antidepressants

Abstract: Utilizing a methodical, anchored approach to categorizing suicidality provides an accurate and comprehensive identification of suicidal events. The FDA's audit of the C-CASA demonstrated excellent transportability of this approach. The Columbia algorithm was used to classify suicidal adverse events in the recent FDA adult antidepressant safety analyses and has also been mandated to be applied to all anticonvulsant trials and other centrally acting agents and nonpsychotropic drugs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
480
1
27

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 723 publications
(510 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
480
1
27
Order By: Relevance
“…Electrocardiograms (ECGs) and laboratory tests were measured at baseline and weeks 4 and 8, and physical examinations were performed at screening and week 8. Suicidal ideation and behavior were prospectively monitored using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), 22 which was administered at screening, baseline, and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8. The Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX), 23 a validated 5-item scale with versions specific to gender and sexual orientation, was used to assess the impact of treatment on sexual function.…”
Section: Clinical Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrocardiograms (ECGs) and laboratory tests were measured at baseline and weeks 4 and 8, and physical examinations were performed at screening and week 8. Suicidal ideation and behavior were prospectively monitored using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), 22 which was administered at screening, baseline, and weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8. The Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX), 23 a validated 5-item scale with versions specific to gender and sexual orientation, was used to assess the impact of treatment on sexual function.…”
Section: Clinical Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definitions of events for completing the suicide registry form and validation process are modeled on the Columbia Classification Algorithm for Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) (7). A suicide is defined as a death resulting from intentional self-inflicted injury as determined by the local medical examiner or authorized law enforcement official.…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The box describes each data format, and Search terms included those that the FDA requested pharmaceutical companies to use when searching company databases for events of suicidality in paediatric trials ("suic", "overdos, "attempt", "cut", "gas", "hang", "hung", "jump", "mutilate", "overdos", "self damage", "self harm", "self inflict", "self injur", "shoot", and "slash"). 15 22 We additionally used the terms "poi", "emot", "labi", "hos", "vio", "agg", "thought", and "think". We were only interested in adverse events that met the definition in the international statistical principles for clinical trials guideline of a treatment emergent adverse event-that is, an event that occurred or worsened after the study drug was started, 23 or adverse events that emerged after discontinuation of the study drug.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FDA found that any conclusion based on such data would be unreliable and might lead to either an unwarranted restriction of the drugs or an underestimation of their dangers. 15 Unsurprisingly, research in other areas has shown that misclassifying or omitting even one adverse event can mean the difference between a statistically significant and non-statistically significant association with a drug. 16 17 We assessed the effects of coding and coding conventions on adverse events data within clinical study reports and compared three different data formats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%