2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined use of aortic dissection detection risk score and D-dimer in the diagnostic workup of suspected acute aortic dissection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
89
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
89
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Five studies met all eligibility criteria. [16][17][18][19][20] The characteristics of these studies and the participants enrolled are outlined in Tables 2 and 3. In addition to the information presented in Tables 2 and 3, some specific points need to be highlighted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five studies met all eligibility criteria. [16][17][18][19][20] The characteristics of these studies and the participants enrolled are outlined in Tables 2 and 3. In addition to the information presented in Tables 2 and 3, some specific points need to be highlighted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the risk score system has a high sensitivity of 95.7% for the detection of AAD (6), its specificity is much lower (39.8%) (7). In recent years, numerous researchers have attempted to seek several novel methods for the early identification of AAD (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). For instance, the combined use of the ADD risk score and D-dimer was studied as part of the current diagnostic work-up of patients with AAD (13,14).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of discordant diagnosis, the final diagnosis was adjudicated by (SG). 17 According to guidelines, the following diagnoses were considered as acute aortic syndromes: Stanford type A and type B AD, aortic intramural hematoma, and penetrating aortic ulcer. 16 …”
Section: Study Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%