2018
DOI: 10.3233/ica-180574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining classifiers with decision templates for automatic fault diagnosis of electrical submersible pumps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The large number of published articles on MI–BCI tasks using EEG signals highlights the importance of the applicability of EEG signals in the BCI domain (Hwang et al, ; Ortiz‐Rosario and Adeli, ). Most EEG‐based BCI systems usually use a structured approach that includes three main steps: (a) preprocessing that may contain three suboperations of noise removal (NR; Çınar, S., and Acır, ; Mutanen et al, ), channel selection (CS; Ghaemi et al, ; Rathee et al, ), and data augmentation (Kalunga et al, 2015; Krell et al, 2018); (b) feature construction, that is choosing appropriate properties of signals, consists of two suboperations of feature extraction (Hsu, ; Zhang et al, ; Aghaei et al, ; Cai et al, ), and feature selection (Zhang et al, ; Lin et al, ; Ma et al, ); and (c) classification that is performed using an appropriate classifier such as support vector machine (Khedher et al, ; Dai and Cao, ; Direito et al, ), probabilistic neural networks (Adeli and Panakkat, ; Sankari and Adeli, ), enhanced probabilistic neural network (Ahmadlou and Adeli, ; Hirschauer et al, ; Fernandes et al, ), competitive probabilistic neural network (Zeinali and Story, ), the recently developed neural dynamics classification algorithm (Rafiei and Adeli, ), or a combination or ensemble of classifiers (Oliveira‐Santos et al ; Reyes et al ). It should be noted that the necessity of each aforementioned suboperation is usually determined by a BCI expert, which is not convenient in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The large number of published articles on MI–BCI tasks using EEG signals highlights the importance of the applicability of EEG signals in the BCI domain (Hwang et al, ; Ortiz‐Rosario and Adeli, ). Most EEG‐based BCI systems usually use a structured approach that includes three main steps: (a) preprocessing that may contain three suboperations of noise removal (NR; Çınar, S., and Acır, ; Mutanen et al, ), channel selection (CS; Ghaemi et al, ; Rathee et al, ), and data augmentation (Kalunga et al, 2015; Krell et al, 2018); (b) feature construction, that is choosing appropriate properties of signals, consists of two suboperations of feature extraction (Hsu, ; Zhang et al, ; Aghaei et al, ; Cai et al, ), and feature selection (Zhang et al, ; Lin et al, ; Ma et al, ); and (c) classification that is performed using an appropriate classifier such as support vector machine (Khedher et al, ; Dai and Cao, ; Direito et al, ), probabilistic neural networks (Adeli and Panakkat, ; Sankari and Adeli, ), enhanced probabilistic neural network (Ahmadlou and Adeli, ; Hirschauer et al, ; Fernandes et al, ), competitive probabilistic neural network (Zeinali and Story, ), the recently developed neural dynamics classification algorithm (Rafiei and Adeli, ), or a combination or ensemble of classifiers (Oliveira‐Santos et al ; Reyes et al ). It should be noted that the necessity of each aforementioned suboperation is usually determined by a BCI expert, which is not convenient in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…choosing appropriate properties of signals, consists of two suboperations of feature extraction (Hsu, 2015;Zhang et al, 2015;Aghaei et al, 2016;Cai et al, 2017), and feature selection Lin et al, 2017;Ma et al, 2018); and (c) classification that is performed using an appropriate classifier such as support vector machine (Khedher et al, 2017;Dai and Cao, 2017;Direito et al, 2017), probabilistic neural networks (Adeli and Panakkat, 2009;Sankari and Adeli, 2011), enhanced probabilistic neural network (Ahmadlou and Adeli, 2010;Hirschauer et al, 2015;Fernandes et al, 2016), competitive probabilistic neural network (Zeinali and Story, 2017), the recently developed neural dynamics classification algorithm (Rafiei and Adeli, 2017), or a combination or ensemble of classifiers (Oliveira-Santos et al 2018;Reyes et al 2018). It should be noted that the necessity of each aforementioned suboperation is usually determined by a BCI expert, which is not convenient in practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of the proposed approach with the methods KNN [15], KNN + [15], KNN + FS [15], KNN + EFS [15], and the method, proposed by Oliveira-Santos et al [18], was also made. Table 7 shows the promising results of using the deep hybrid model for automatic diagnosis of ESP failures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rauber et al [17] compared the performance of ELM with and without kernel mapping with other classifiers. Also, three types of motor pump faults (shaft misalignment, pump blade unbalance, and mechanical rubbing) and faulty accelerometer sensors were evaluated [18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the others can be considered derivations, adaptations, or a mix of them. Table 1 resumes these meta-algorithms used in [11][12][13].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%