2006 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology 2006
DOI: 10.1109/isspit.2006.270875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining Decoded-and-Forwarded Signals in Gaussian Cooperative Channels

Abstract: -The

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(10 reference statements)
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the complexity of the proposed scheme increases as the modulation increases. However, to assist the detection at the destination, our proposed scheme only requires the average receive SNR of S-R link to compute individual SER of the modulation as shown in (6) and (7). Therefore, our proposed scheme still inherits an interesting trade-off between the error rate performance and the system complexity.…”
Section: Complexity Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the complexity of the proposed scheme increases as the modulation increases. However, to assist the detection at the destination, our proposed scheme only requires the average receive SNR of S-R link to compute individual SER of the modulation as shown in (6) and (7). Therefore, our proposed scheme still inherits an interesting trade-off between the error rate performance and the system complexity.…”
Section: Complexity Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6], Cooperative-MRC (C-MRC) is introduced and yet, it suffers losses in assymetrical networks and is not easily feasible in relay networks with different modulations. In [7]- [8], the authors have presented a combining strategy with perfect channel state information (CSI) of S-R link at the destination. However, their work assumes average symbol error rate (SER) as the side information and hence, this strategy does not offer a complete ML solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the linear combiners derived by [3,4,6] cannot be used in general. However, provided that the above compatibility condition is met, the ML combiner can be derived as we show now.…”
Section: When the Source And Relay Use Arbitrary And Different Modulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the modulations at the source and relay are identical, the MRC can severely degrade the receiver performance because it does not compensate for the decoding noise introduced by the relay [2][3][4][5][6]. This is why the authors of [2,4] proposed a maximum-likelihood detector (MLD) for combining two BPSK-modulated signals coming from the source and relay. The authors of [6] proposed an improved MRC called C-MRC which aims at maximizing receive diversity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, C-MRC results in serious propagation error under asymmetrical networks when SNR of R-D link is larger than that of S-D link or S-R link. In addition, unlike ML-based strategy, C-MRC cannot be used in relay networks with arbitrary modulation (Djeumou et al, 2006). Djeumou et al (2006) proposed the performance of the hard-decision ML criterion detectionbased combining technique under coded cooperative scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%