2019
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000015981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combining procalcitonin with the qSOFA and sepsis mortality prediction

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
1
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
80
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Yu H et al searched the levels of ProCT and the 30-day mortality rate, together with a quick sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, in hospitalized patients. They found a significant correlation between those parameters unlike our findings [14]. Fritz et al assessed ProCT levels and mortality after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery [15].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Yu H et al searched the levels of ProCT and the 30-day mortality rate, together with a quick sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, in hospitalized patients. They found a significant correlation between those parameters unlike our findings [14]. Fritz et al assessed ProCT levels and mortality after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery [15].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Procalcitonin is an important prognostic indicator in septic patients, with regard to severity of sepsis [8] and in-hospital mortality [9]. In this study, when controlling for other variables, PCT values above 2.0 ng/dL were associated with positive blood cultures, increased in-hospital mortality, and septic shock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…28 One article included patients with symptoms of systemic infection in which PCT or blood cultures were taken within 24 hours of admission. 29 One article used the Sepsis-3 de nition 7 as inclusion criterion. 30…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,31 Only a minority of the articles used a prede ned cutoff of the studied biomarkers and scoring system. 17,25,27,29 There were no concerns of possible bias in ow and timing of the biomarkers and scoring systems that were investigated. Blood sampling was performed during ED visit in all studies.…”
Section: Quadas-2 Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%