2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01323.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commentary on Naumanen P (2006) The health promotion model as assessed by ageing workers. Journal of Clinical Nursing 15, 219–266

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I'm very pleased to get Whitehead's (2006) comments and have the opportunity to respond. Whitehead (2006) based his opinions on a number of good references that also supported the consequences of the health promotion model of ageing workers presented in the article.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…I'm very pleased to get Whitehead's (2006) comments and have the opportunity to respond. Whitehead (2006) based his opinions on a number of good references that also supported the consequences of the health promotion model of ageing workers presented in the article.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I'm very pleased to get Whitehead's (2006) comments and have the opportunity to respond. Whitehead (2006) based his opinions on a number of good references that also supported the consequences of the health promotion model of ageing workers presented in the article. He wrote: ‘study fails to move beyond the scope and practice of the occupational health nurse's traditional role…’ Occupational health care represents very narrow and specific healthcare area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%