2022
DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.13593
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commentary to “Translational machine learning for child and adolescent psychiatry”

Abstract: In this commentary on ‘Translational Machine Learning for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,’ by Dwyer and Koutsouleris, we summarize some of the main points made by the authors, which highlight the importance of emerging applications of machine learning for psychiatric disorders in youth but also emphasize principles of good practice. We also offer complementary insights regarding large‐scale training, harmonization, and the ability of these artificial intelligence models to adapt to new datasets, which is crit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, Dwyer & Koutsouleris (2022) illustrate the potential of machine learning methods that build on dimensional data across multiple levels of analysis to optimize predictions about prognosis and treatment. In their commentary, Davatzikos & Satterthwaite (2022) observe that these methods also have the potential to reduce diagnostic heterogeneity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Dwyer & Koutsouleris (2022) illustrate the potential of machine learning methods that build on dimensional data across multiple levels of analysis to optimize predictions about prognosis and treatment. In their commentary, Davatzikos & Satterthwaite (2022) observe that these methods also have the potential to reduce diagnostic heterogeneity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
In Davatzikos and Satterthwaite (2022), in-text and reference details for Dwyer and Koutsouleris (2022) were missing. This has been added in the article.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Jaffee (2022), in‐text citation and reference details for Anderson, Newlove‐Delgado, and Ford (2022), Astle, Holmes, Kievit, and Gathercole (2022), Cabrera (2022), Chronis‐Tuscano (2022), Davatzikos and Satterthwaite (2022), Dwyer and Koutsouleris (2022), Hinshaw, Nguyen, O’Grady, and Rosenthal (2022), Lansford (2022), Pellicano and den Houting (2022), Pacheco et al. (2022) and Tuomainen (2022) were missing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%