Comments on remodelling the neolithic in Southern Norway

H⊘eg, Helge I.

doi:10.1080/00293652.1988.9965466

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…None of these features seem able to demonstrate the anthropogenic origin of disturbances on their own. Given the wide range of factors bearing upon the composition and meaning of pollen spectra, some authorities argue that only the presence of cereal pollen can show beyond doubt the anthropogenic cause of disturbance phases (Groenman van Waateringe 1983;Bergelund 1985;Hoeg 1988;Simmons &c Innes 1987;Edwards 1982;1989a;1989b). This would rule out any forest clearances not associated with cereal cultivation.…”

Section: Palynological Evidencementioning

confidence: 99%

Plant Use in the Mesolithic and its Role in the Transition to Farming

Zvelebil

1994

Proc. Prehist. Soc.

170

101

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this paper is to review the current evidence for plant use in Mesolithic Europe and to summarize its implications. In order to do so, four sources of data are examined: macrobotanical remains, palynological data, artefactual evidence, and the human biological record.A prelimary survey of palaeobotanical evidence for plant use in the Mesolithic indicates that the evidence is far more extensive than expected hitherto and that accumulations of plant food, especially of nuts, point to their regular and extensive use. In those areas such as Britain, where a large number of fine-resolution palynological studies have been carried out, the incidence of clearance and burning phases seems to be too high to be explained by acts of nature alone. A good case can be made for deliberate forest clearance and the maintenance of a more open landscape by Late Mesolithic groups as part of a promotional strategy to increase the productivity of nut and fruit trees and shrubs, wetland plants, and possibly native grasses.Artefactual evidence points to a widespread distribution of soil-working tools (hoes and antler mattocks), especially in temperate Europe, and to a greater than expected presence of reaping and grinding equipment, lending conditional support for the existence of a specialized plant processing tool kit for digging, reaping, and plant processing.Palaeopathological evidence indicates the existence of a dietary pattern in the west Mediterranean making extensive use of starchy and carbohydrate foods which resulted in a high caries rate among the Mesolithic population of that area.In discussing the signiftcanse of these four lines of evidence, it is argued that, by the Late Mesolithic, the patterns of plant use support the notion of wild plant food husbandry instead of the incidental and opportunistic use of plants for food which has implicitly been accepted as a norm for the Mesolithic in Europe. Three geographical areas can be identified with their specific pattern of plant use: temperate Europe, Mediterranean Europe, and the south-eastern Balkans/Pontic Steppe. The patterns of plant use suggested in this paper emphasize the additive nature of the adoption of the agro-pastoral Neolithic farming practices in Europe.

show abstract

Section: Palynological Evidencementioning

confidence: 99%