Comments regarding Namratha N, Shett V. A technique to evaluate custom tray border extensions before peripheral molding. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1603-4

Aggarwal, Himanshi; Kumar, Pradeep

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.09.030

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[18][19][20] Alternative materials for border molding such as light cure resin, modeling clay and bubble gum had advantages of increased working time and operator convenience. [21][22][23][24] An illustration of innovations for border molding procedure is presented in Fig. 1.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors Influencing Technology Adoption of a Peripheral Tracing Device in Complete Denture Impressions

Gali

Melepurra

Sriniva

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: Rapid advancements in dental technologies have played a significant role in creating an efficient dental practice. The study aimed to explore the factors influencing the technology adoption of a device for complete denture impressions among dental health professionals. Materials and methods: Based on the variables expressed during the focus group discussion and literature review, a survey was conducted using a constructed questionnaire among 200 general dental practitioners, prosthodontists and academicians in prominent dental schools in Bengaluru, India. The questionnaire consisted predominantly of structured, closed-end questions based on the UTAUT2 Model using five-point Likert scale. Discriminant analysis was conducted to understand the characteristics of variables for discrimination of adopters and non-adopters of the device. Results: Participants showed a keen interest in adopting technology due to its convenience. 80.5 % of dentists were tempted to purchase if trial of the product was made available. Discriminant Analysis predicted the group membership with a good level of classification accuracy of adopters of 84 %. The variables that discriminated adopters and non-adopters were “easy to become skillful”, “plan to use the device more frequently”, “peer influence” “willingness to purchase the device”, “find it enjoyable” and “it is entertaining”. Conclusions: Effort Expectancy, Behavior, Social Influence and Hedonic Motivation played a role in influencing technology adoption among dental professionals. A dental professional is more likely to adopt the technology, if it can help improve his or her skills.

show abstract