1984
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commitment to company and union: Parallel models.

Abstract: Parallel models of commitment to company and commitment to union were tested on a sample of transportation department employees of a unionized metropolitan newspaper Results indicated that an organizational-commitment model is less successful in predicting union commitment than company commitment The most striking divergence occurred with respect to personal characteristics, which were significantly correlated with company commitment and were unrelated to union commitment On the other hand, the work-experience… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
90
1
5

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
5
90
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A summary of the findings of such research based on one dimension of both union and organizational commitment is presented by Cohen (2003). Fukami and Larson's (1984) findings that variables related to organizational commitment were not related to union commitment support the notion that the two commitments represent divergent models. Barling, Wade and Fullagar (1990), who replicated Fukami and Larson's (1984) study, obtained similar findings, as did Magenau, Martin and Peterson (1988), who, in four samples of rank-and-file union members and stewards, found few common predictors of commitment to the union and the organization.…”
Section: Correlates Of Dual Commitmentsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A summary of the findings of such research based on one dimension of both union and organizational commitment is presented by Cohen (2003). Fukami and Larson's (1984) findings that variables related to organizational commitment were not related to union commitment support the notion that the two commitments represent divergent models. Barling, Wade and Fullagar (1990), who replicated Fukami and Larson's (1984) study, obtained similar findings, as did Magenau, Martin and Peterson (1988), who, in four samples of rank-and-file union members and stewards, found few common predictors of commitment to the union and the organization.…”
Section: Correlates Of Dual Commitmentsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Knowledge of the relationship with determinants is important for understanding the causes underlying unilateral or dual commitment. Technically, many researchers have used what is termed the parallel models approach (Fukami and Larson, 1984), where organization and union commitment are each regressed on a set of independent variables to identify common predictors of both union and organizational commitment. These predictors, in turn, are then considered predictors of dual commitment.…”
Section: Correlates Of Dual Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Sindicato: versão reduzida de dez itens (Fukami e Larson, 1984), construída a partir da escala inicial de Gordon et al (1980) e que apresenta o mesmo conteúdo da escala de comprometimento com a organização, mas com foco no sindicato.…”
Section: O Envolvimento Ou Comprometimento Do Trabalhador Parece Ser unclassified
“…Thirdly, dual commitment research is divided into OC and labor union commitment, and also explains that these factors have strong correlations [11] . Furthermore, personal characteristics, work experiences, role-related factors, and characteristics of structure spontaneously enhance OC and labor union commitment because they are associated with organizational membership [10] . Since labor union commitment means workers are absorbed in the labor union, they can have positive attitudes to the organization, such as OC.…”
Section: Effect Of Alu On Oc and Ocbmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, LUS is a function of the agreement between workers' expectations and union performance on a number of jobs and union-associated features [9] . Second, LUC means unionists' commitment to the labor union [10] . Dual commitment research classified LUC and OC [11] .…”
Section: Attitude To Labor Unionmentioning
confidence: 99%