Common Core in Danger? Personalized Information and the Fragmentation of the Public Agenda

Abstract

The diversification of information sources has reignited the controversy on media-induced fragmentation endangering social integration. The media's capability to set the public agenda and create issues as a common core is a pivotal part of the public sphere and contributes fundamentally to society's cohesion. Algorithm-driven sources like social media that personalize content to the preferences of individuals and their social networks are considered agents of fragmentation of the public sphere. Politically extreme individuals relying on them may be particularly vulnerable to losing touch with society's common core. We employ an innovative operationalization of fragmentation on the individual level: “issue horizons”—comprising issue diversity, top issue focus, and issue overlap—to investigate how different information sources affect fragmentation. In a two-week daily diary, conducted 2016 in Germany, 356 participants named the two most important political issues of each day and reported the issue-specific sources of information. Results show that social media reliance neither increases nor decreases the compatibility of individuals' issue horizons, but news media reliance significantly increases the compatibility of issue horizons among the politically more extreme. Not relying on news media (but rather on social media) means that politically extreme persons are at risk of losing touch with society's mainstream. This attests to the news media's ongoing, indispensable integration function. Using multiple sources of political information—including the news media—appears to be of paramount importance in ensuring that most citizens are aware of the most important issues facing the nation.

Impact of China's community of shared destiny policy (CCSDP) on development and its bearing on trade and ethnicity in Africa

“…The findings demonstrate that respondents' knowledge and impressions of the CCSDP varied, with the majority hearing about the policy from the mainstream media. This finding is consistent with earlier research indicating that the media is an important source of information for the general people (Magin et al. , 2022).…”

Bubble reachers and uncivil discourse in polarized online public sphere

“…They bridge ideological gaps and act as connectors between users with diverse political opinions, similar to how brokers bridge gaps between different groups or clusters in a network. Research suggests that, in practice, legacy media outlets are important bubble reachers in this regard [ 20 , 44 , 45 ]. For instance, Magin et al [ 45 ] show that legacy media outlets help politically extreme individuals sustain engagement with the fundamental essence of public dialogue.…”

“…Research suggests that, in practice, legacy media outlets are important bubble reachers in this regard [ 20 , 44 , 45 ]. For instance, Magin et al [ 45 ] show that legacy media outlets help politically extreme individuals sustain engagement with the fundamental essence of public dialogue.…”

Chemophobia and passion: why chemists should desire Marcel Proust

“…Two years of the pandemic have accelerated long-term trends such as fragmentation of the media [ 41 , 42 ], social networks [ 43 ], society [ 44 ], and hypernarrativity [ 45 ]. Similarly, the influence of emotions on public discourse has substantially increased [ 46 ], and this development coincides with the massive spread of misinformation.…”