2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common Strategy for Adult and Pediatric Medulloblastoma: A Multicenter Series of 253 Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
120
5
14

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
12
120
5
14
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Recently reported overall survival rates for both children and adults are in the 60th and 70th percentiles, a significant increase from the 29% 5-year overall survival rate reported in earlier periods. 2,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Studies have demonstrated that medulloblastomas in adults and children are histologically and genetically different diseases. [11][12][13] Because of obvious differences in expected survival between adults and children in the general population (with adults more likely to die than children), comparing the survival profiles of children and adults with brain tumors requires a particular approach, namely, the use of relative survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Recently reported overall survival rates for both children and adults are in the 60th and 70th percentiles, a significant increase from the 29% 5-year overall survival rate reported in earlier periods. 2,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Studies have demonstrated that medulloblastomas in adults and children are histologically and genetically different diseases. [11][12][13] Because of obvious differences in expected survival between adults and children in the general population (with adults more likely to die than children), comparing the survival profiles of children and adults with brain tumors requires a particular approach, namely, the use of relative survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study by Padovani et al which had the greatest number of patients, metastasis, postoperative performance, central nervous system involvement were determined as factors that are important for prognosis; [19] other prognostic factors were determined to be M stage and duration before initiation of postoperative RT in the study by Abacıoğlu et al [21] location of tumor in the study by Menon et al [30] type of surgery, RT and histology in the study by Lai et al [31] gender in the study by Riffaud et al [32] performed with gamma knife. There were less side effects, and higher doses could be attained by this way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five and 10 year overall survival rates were reported as 58.5% and 41%, respectively. [19] Adjuvant RT should be initiated within 28-30 days following surgery, and the treatment should be continued without any interruptions if possible. In International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) PNET-3 study, it was stated that interruptions during treatment affected overall and disease-free survival adversely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiotherapy to the craniospinal axis at a dose of 36 Gy for 4 weeks followed by a boost to the posterior fossa at a dose of 54 Gy for 6 weeks has been adopted as standard practice. In a French multicenter study, a radiotherapy dose of <50 Gy to the posterior fossa was found to be a poor prognostic factor for MB patients (11). The extent of resection and the interval between surgery and radiotherapy were also prognostic factors of MB (12,13).…”
Section: A B C Dmentioning
confidence: 95%