The 2006 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network Proceedings
DOI: 10.1109/ijcnn.2006.1716343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Common Subset Selection of Inputs in Multiresponse Regression

Abstract: Abstract-We propose the Multiresponse Sparse Regression algorithm, an input selection method for the purpose of estimating several response variables. It is a forward selection procedure for linearly parameterized models, which updates with carefully chosen step lengths. The step length rule extends the correlation criterion of the Least Angle Regression algorithm for many responses. We present a general concept and explicit formulas for three different variants of the algorithm. Based on experiments with simu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative approach is "multiresponse sparse regression" (MRSR), proposed by Similä and Tikka (2006) as an extension of LARS that allows for a multivariate response variable.…”
Section: Least Angle Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…An alternative approach is "multiresponse sparse regression" (MRSR), proposed by Similä and Tikka (2006) as an extension of LARS that allows for a multivariate response variable.…”
Section: Least Angle Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Denote the fitted value of R, based on the first m regressors chosen, byR m (withR 0 = 0), and denote the j-th column of X by x (j) . Following Similä and Tikka (2006), the role of correlations in the description of the univariate case above is now played by…”
Section: Least Angle Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the greedy stepwise methods may fail to recognize important combinations of inputs, especially when the inputs are highly correlated (Derksen and Keselman, 1992). Better results can be obtained by incorporating shrinking in the selection strategy (Breiman, 1996;Similä and Tikka, 2006). Bayesian methods offer another approach (Brown et al, 2002), which is theoretically sound but may be a bit technical from a practical point of view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%