2005 International Conference on Control and Automation
DOI: 10.1109/icca.2005.1528104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CommonCube-based Conceptual Modeling of ETL Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the simplicity of conceptual models promotes understanding even by non-technical users, and ensures the simplicity of founding a logical model and implementing it efficiently. Indeed, the authors in [31] asserted that it is imperative to employ a simple conceptual model, in order to (i) provide powerful modeling methods to facilitate smooth redefinition and revision efforts; (ii) reflect the schema of both the data sources and the target DW explicitly; and (iii) serve as the means of communication with the executing phase of an ETL process. Moreover, even the authors of the synthesized contributions detailed a case study or demonstration example, in order to prove the feasibility of the proposed models.…”
Section: Discussion and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the simplicity of conceptual models promotes understanding even by non-technical users, and ensures the simplicity of founding a logical model and implementing it efficiently. Indeed, the authors in [31] asserted that it is imperative to employ a simple conceptual model, in order to (i) provide powerful modeling methods to facilitate smooth redefinition and revision efforts; (ii) reflect the schema of both the data sources and the target DW explicitly; and (iii) serve as the means of communication with the executing phase of an ETL process. Moreover, even the authors of the synthesized contributions detailed a case study or demonstration example, in order to prove the feasibility of the proposed models.…”
Section: Discussion and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we propose a new categorization of the studied research works. As follows from Figure 1, we categorize these chronologically sorted research works into six main classes, according to the modeling formalism on which they are based: (i) Model based on UML [22]; (ii) model based on ontology [23]; (iii) model based on MDA [24] and model-driven development (MDD) [25]; (iv) model based on graphical flow formalism, including BPMN [26], the CPN modeling language [27], YAWL (Yet Another Workflow Language) [28], and data flow visualization [29]; (v) model based on ad hoc formalisms, including conceptual constructs [30], CommonCube [31], and EMD [32]; and, finally, (vi) contributions dealing with Big Data.…”
Section: Proposed Classification Of Etl/elt Process Modeling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation