Communication Technologies Based on Voluntary Blinks: Assessment and Design

Abstract

Some people with severe disabilities are confined in a state in which communication is virtually impossible, being reduced to communicating with their eyes or using sophisticated systems that translate thoughts into words. The EyeTrackers and Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) are suitable systems for those people but their main drawback is their cost. More affordable devices are capable of detecting voluntary blinks and translating them into a binary signal that allows the selection, for example, of an ideogram on a communication board. We tested four different systems based on infrared, bioelectrical signals (Electro-Oculography (EOG) and Electro-Encephalography (EEG)), and video processing. The experiments were performed by people with/without disabilities and analyzed the systems' performances, usability, and method of voluntary blinking (long blinks or sequence of two short blinks). The best accuracy (99.3%) was obtained using Infrared-Oculography (IR-OG) and the worst with the EEG headset (85.9%) and there was a statistical influence of the technology on accuracy. Regarding the method of voluntary blinking, the use of long or double blinks had no statistical influence on accuracy, excluding EOG, and the time taken to perform double blinks was shorter, resulting in a potentially much faster interface. People with disabilities obtained similar values but with greater variability. The preferred technology and blinking methods were Video-Oculography (VOG) and long blinks, respectively. The several Open-Source Hardware (OSHW) devices have been developed and a new algorithm for detecting voluntary blinks has also been proposed, which outperforms most of the published papers in the reviewed literature.

Development and Testing of Motion-Detection Techniques for People with Cerebral Palsy

“…Among the systems used, we found that the system based on image processing gave better results since it had a higher probability in identifying some head movements. In addition, this system has several advantages with respect to the use of sensor type IMU or any that requires the placement of a device on the user [10]. Another clear advantage is that most people are familiar with webcams, which makes it easier for the caregiver to connect the system properly and easily.…”

Controlling a Mouse Pointer with a Single-Channel EEG Sensor

“…To estimate the value to assign to , we used the data given in [ 46 ]. They conducted several experiments to analyze blink detection with different devices, including the same EEG headset as ours.…”

Validation of Electroencephalographic Recordings Obtained with a Consumer-Grade, Single Dry Electrode, Low-Cost Device: A Comparative Study

“…Wearable EEG devices are often used to generate control commands that trigger predefined actions (e.g., mouse clicks) based on easy recognizable signals (i.e., the eye blinks, [49]). Thus, blinking behavior might be used to compare the devices’ performance [32,50]. We calculated and compared the blink detection rates among devices and tasks.…”