2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Communicative affordances and participation frameworks in mediated interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Hutchby, 2001;Arminen, 2005). Interaction in any setting is viewed as a sequentially organized multimodal process, which relies on resources of the body and the communicative affordances of the material setting, including written materials and technological artefacts located and used in the interactional setting (Hutchby, 2014). The analysis shows how the participants draw on different modalities and the affordances of the technology utilized in managing stepwise entry in to the shared meeting space and initiating the meeting proper.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hutchby, 2001;Arminen, 2005). Interaction in any setting is viewed as a sequentially organized multimodal process, which relies on resources of the body and the communicative affordances of the material setting, including written materials and technological artefacts located and used in the interactional setting (Hutchby, 2014). The analysis shows how the participants draw on different modalities and the affordances of the technology utilized in managing stepwise entry in to the shared meeting space and initiating the meeting proper.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Affordances are both functional and relational, enabling or constraining engagement in different ways depending on context (Hutchby, 2014). In other words, users develop culturally specific understandings of communication technologies and their communicative possibilities -on the basis of which certain media and communicative practices are perceived as more appropriate than others in certain contexts.…”
Section: "Perpetual Contact" As a Communicative Affordancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…). Considered in tandem with research on transduction technologies themselves (e.g., Hutchby ; Keating ), this body of work suggests that anthropologists should develop a robust discourse about the partiality of recording and, in particular, the ways that partiality embedded in the affordances of transducers impacts ethnographic fieldwork.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%