Community Disaster Resilience in the COVID-19 Outbreak: Insights from Shanghai’s Experience in China

Zhang, Liwei; Zhao, Jingyao; Liu, Jixin; Chen, Kelin

doi:10.2147/rmhp.s283447

Cited by 23 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Deshmukh et al systematically summarized the updated epidemiology, causes, clinical manifestation and diagnosis, as well as prevention and control of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, which is essential to both manage the current pandemic and to conceive comprehensive measures to prevent such outbreaks in the future ( 60 ). Communities are central to the practice of public health emergency preparedness and response ( 61 ), it is important to identify the source of infection at the community level as soon as possible to block the transmission path of the virus to prevent the spread of the pandemic. The implementation of grid management in the community and the adoption of precise management and control measures to reduce unnecessary personnel movement can effectively reduce the risk of pandemic spread, and improving community disaster resilience are an effective method for coping with such a public health emergency ( 62 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowledge Mapping Analysis of Public Health Emergency Management Research Based on Web of Science

Yang

Fang

Zhu

2022

Front. Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

At present, major public health emergencies frequently occur worldwide, and it is of great significance to analyze the research status and latest developments in this field to improve the ability of public health emergency management in various countries. This paper took 5,143 related studies from 2007 to 2020 from the Web of Science as research object and used CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and other software to perform co-word analysis, social network analysis, and cluster analysis. The results and conclusions were as follows: (1) the related research identified three periods: the exploration, growth, and outbreak period; (2) chronologically: the relevant research evolved from medical and health care for major diseases to emergency management and risk assessment of public health emergencies and then researched the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia epidemic; (3) clustering analysis of high-frequency keywords, identifying three research hotspots: “disaster prevention and emergency medical services,” “outbreak and management of infectious diseases in Africa,” and “emergency management under the COVID-19 pneumonia epidemic.” Finally, this study combined the data and literature analysis to point out possible future research directions: from the research of the COVID-19 pneumonia epidemic to the research of general major public health emergencies, thinking and remodeling of the national public health emergency management system, and exploring the establishment of an efficient international emergency management cooperation mechanism.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowledge Mapping Analysis of Public Health Emergency Management Research Based on Web of Science

Yang

Fang

Zhu

2022

Front. Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, the specific aspects of self-efficacy we assessed cannot influence behavior change outside of the stressful circumstances surrounding the pandemic, which may have diluted effects from the self-assessment of general resiliency. We also evaluated the effect of community resilience, which given its buffering role in the wake of natural disasters [ 36 ] could be a key resource in enduring a pandemic [ 53 ]. Our findings suggest that greater community resilience was associated with increased contacts and that this effect was magnified among individuals identifying with racially or ethnically marginalized groups.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cognitive factors influenced physical distancing adherence during the COVID-19 pandemic in a population-specific way

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Even early in the COVID-19 pandemic, adherence to physical distancing measures was variable, exposing some communities to elevated risk. While cognitive factors from the Health Belief Model (HBM) and resilience correlate with compliance with physical distancing, external conditions may preclude full compliance with physical distancing guidelines. Our objective was to identify HBM and resilience constructs that could be used to improve adherence to physical distancing even when full compliance is not possible. We examined adherence as expressed through 7-day non-work, non-household contact rates in two cohorts: 1) adults in households with children from Minnesota and Iowa; and 2) adults ≥50 years-old from Minnesota, one-third of whom had Parkinson’s disease. We identified multiple cognitive factors associated with physical distancing adherence, specifically perceived severity, benefits, self-efficacy, and barriers. However, the magnitude, and occasionally the direction, of these associations was population-dependent. In Cohort 1, perceived self-efficacy for remaining 6-feet from others was associated with a 29% lower contact rate (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.65, 0.77). This finding was consistent across all race/ethnicity and income groups we examined. The barriers to adherence of having a child in childcare and having financial concerns had the largest effects among individuals from marginalized racial and ethnic groups and high-income households. In Cohort 2, self-efficacy to quarantine/isolate was associated with a 23% decrease in contacts (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.66, 0.89), but upon stratification by education level, the association was only present for those with at least a Bachelor’s degree. Education also modified the effect of the barrier to adherence leaving home for work, increasing contacts among those with a Bachelor’s degree and reducing contacts among those without. Our findings suggest that public health messaging tailored to the identified cognitive factors has the potential to improve physical distancing adherence, but population-specific needs must be considered to maximize effectiveness.

show abstract

“…While times are certainly hard, and the outlook has been grim, survivors seem poised to face these setbacks head on. In applying a community resilience scheme, we suggest further study into both preparation for and response to disaster faced by vulnerable communities like the IPV survivors in this study (e.g., [ 57 ]). Identification of vulnerabilities should not only include all aspects of health and well-being as is often considered but also should include all aspects of survivor livlihood such as finances, food, transportation, and social networks.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recognizing Resilience: Exploring the Impacts of COVID-19 on Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence

Clark

Jordan

2021

Gend. Issues

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Community Disaster Resilience in the COVID-19 Outbreak: Insights from Shanghai’s Experience in China

Cited by 23 publications

References 40 publications

Knowledge Mapping Analysis of Public Health Emergency Management Research Based on Web of Science

Knowledge Mapping Analysis of Public Health Emergency Management Research Based on Web of Science

Cognitive factors influenced physical distancing adherence during the COVID-19 pandemic in a population-specific way

Recognizing Resilience: Exploring the Impacts of COVID-19 on Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About