2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Commuter benefits programs: Impacts on mode choice, VMT, and spillover effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the subset of households used for weekday homebased-work VMT estimation, almost half (45%) made no homebasedwork VMT. To account for the truncation and clustering around zero of these outcome variables, a Tobit model specification was used to estimate total VMT and homebasedwork VMT (Shin 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the subset of households used for weekday homebased-work VMT estimation, almost half (45%) made no homebasedwork VMT. To account for the truncation and clustering around zero of these outcome variables, a Tobit model specification was used to estimate total VMT and homebasedwork VMT (Shin 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, work by Clifton et al (2020) suggests that even developments with no off-street parking have development-level impacts on the surrounding neighborhood (including from both personally owned vehicles and car/ride share). Further, Shin (2020) provides evidence that free or subsidized workplace parking is associated with VMT increases that spill over to non-work trips. Moreover, parking provisions are closely tied to the ability to develop density-as Manville et al (2013) discuss, the issues related to redeveloping parking inhibit desires to increase housing and destination accessibility.…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The BE variables at workplace locations and around the route areas also affect commute durations. Although there exist arguments about the effect sizes of the BE at residences and beyond residential locations (e.g., workplace locations), prior studies have demonstrated that the BE variables at workplace locations affect various commute-related terms, such as modes [ 18 ], distances [ 19 ], vehicle miles traveled [ 20 ], and well-being [ 21 ]. In addition, the BE variables along a route usually trigger various kinds of travel behavior, and their relationships have been confirmed by many prior studies [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the city-level BE generally reflects the characteristics of the BE beyond residential locations (e.g., workplaces and route areas), it is critical to consider the BE at the neighborhood and city levels within a unified framework. Although some recent studies have confirmed that both levels of the BE variables are determinants of travel-related parameters [ 4 , 20 ], prior studies focusing on commute durations have tended to examine the impacts of the BE variables at different levels, separately. Considering the BE at both the neighborhood and city levels within a unified framework can provide further refined implications and avoid biased results, owing to omitting essential variables.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to some scholars [16], studies on commuting have rarely considered elements other than commuting mode selection and route optimization. For example, scholars [17] combined mobile phone signaling data with point of interest data to propose a method for identifying the service areas of commuter CB and travel demand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%