Cómo encontrar un lugar en el mundo: explorando experiencias de recuperación de personas con trastornos mentales graves

Saavedra, Javier

doi:10.1590/s0104-59702011000100008

Cited by 13 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, an emphasis on availability of basic needs as exemplified in the theme "Economic recovery" was also found to be a key concern for users in the review conducted by (91) and the Australian National Survey of Psychotic Illness (92). The importance of factors related to social justice which fall under the theme "Prosperity" is widely supported by research on social determinants of health (93)(94)(95).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recovery From Severe Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review of Service User and Informal Caregiver Perspectives

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The recovery approach aims to have users' perspectives at the heart of service development and research; it is a holistic perspective that considers social needs, personal growth and inclusion. In the last decade recovery-oriented research and practice has increased greatly, however, a comprehensive model of recovery considering exclusively the perspectives of people with lived experience has not been devised.Aims: This review aimed to develop a framework and contextualize service users' and informal caregivers' understanding of recovery from severe mental health problems.Methods: We systematically searched 6 databases including key terms related to knowledge, experience and narratives AND mental health AND personal recovery. The search was supplemented with reference sourcing through gray literature, reference tracking and expert consultation. Data analysis consisted of a qualitative meta-synthesis using constant comparative methods.Results: Sixty-two studies were analyzed. A pattern emerged regarding the recovery paradigms that the studies used to frame their findings. The resulting recovery framework included the domains Social recovery; Prosperity (Legal, political, and economic recovery); Individual Recovery; and Clinical Recovery Experience (SPICE). Service users' definitions of recovery tended to prioritize social aspects, particularly being accepted and connecting with others, while caregivers focused instead on clinical definitions of recovery such as symptom remission. Both groups emphasized individual aspects such as becoming self-sufficient and achieving personal goals, which was strongly linked with having economic means for independence.Conclusions: The recovery model provided by this review offers a template for further research in the field and a guide for policy and practice. Predominant definitions of recovery currently reflect understandings of mental health which focus on an individual perspective, while this review found an important emphasis on socio-political aspects. At the same time, only a small number of studies took place in low-income countries, focused on minoritized populations, or included caregivers' perspectives. These are important gaps in the literature that require further attention.Systematic Review Registration: The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42017076450); https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=76450.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recovery From Severe Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review of Service User and Informal Caregiver Perspectives

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Furthermore, an emphasis on availability of basic needs as exemplified in the theme “Economic recovery” was also found to be a key concern for users in the review conducted by MacÍas (2011) and the Australian National Survey of Psychotic Illness (Morgan et al, 2012). The importance of factors related to social justice which fall under the theme “Prosperity” is widely supported by research on social determinants of health (Morrow & Weisser, 2012; Verhaegh et al, 2011; Wickham et al, 2014).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recovery from severe mental health problems: A systematic review of service user and informal caregiver perspectives

Juan

Gronholm

Heslin

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The recovery approach aims to have users′ perspectives at the heart of service development and research; it is a holistic perspective that considers social needs, personal growth and inclusion. In the last decade recovery-oriented research and practice has increased greatly, however, a comprehensive model of recovery considering exclusively the perspectives of people with lived experience has not been devised. Aims: This review aimed to develop a framework and contextualise service users′ and informal caregivers′ understanding of recovery from severe mental health problems. Methods: A systematic search of 6 databases including key terms related to knowledge, experience and narratives AND mental health AND personal recovery. The search was supplemented with reference sourcing through grey literature, reference tracking and expert consultation. Data analysis consisted of a qualitative meta-synthesis using constant comparative methods. Results: Sixty-two studies were analysed. A pattern emerged regarding the recovery paradigms that the studies used to frame their findings. Recovery domains included Legal, political and economic recovery; Social recovery; Individual recovery; and Clinical recovery experience. Service users′ definitions of recovery tended to prioritise social aspects, particularly being accepted and connecting with others, while caregivers focused instead on clinical definitions of recovery such as symptom remission. Both groups emphasised individual aspects such as becoming self-sufficient and achieving personal goals, which was strongly linked with having economic means for independence. Conclusions: The recovery model provided by this review offers a template for further research in the field and a guide for policy and practice. Predominant definitions of recovery currently reflect understandings of mental health which focus on an individual perspective, while this review found an important emphasis on socio-political aspects. At the same time, only a small number of studies took place in low-income countries, focused on minoritised populations, or included caregivers′ perspectives. These are important gaps in the literature that require further attention.

show abstract

“…El modelo de recuperación es recientemente conocida fuera del ámbito anglosajón, no obstante se puede encontrar un análisis histórico y un repaso de la investigación al respecto en revistas españolas (Saavedra, 2011). Este acercamiento a la salud mental, como veremos en el siguiente apartado, ha permitido una nueva configuración e implementación de las prácticas creativas en el ámbito de la salud mental.…”

Section: Protagonistasunclassified

La recuperación mutua en personas con trastornos psicológicos o diversidad funcional a través de la práctica creativa

Saavedra¹,

Sánchez²,

Cruz³

et al. 2016

Arte Individ. Soc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumenEn el presente artículo introducimos el concepto de "recuperación mutua" y proponemos las prácticas creativas como herramientas eficientesde recuperación de personas tanto con problemas de salud mental como con algún tipo de diversidad funcional. Frente al concepto clásico de "arte-terapia" nosotros proponemos el concepto de "práctica creativa" como más compatible con el modelo de "recuperación mutua". Para ello, en primer lugar realizamos un breve repaso crítico a la relación del arte con la locura. Seguidamente, presentamos los conceptos hermanos de "recuperación" y "recuperación mutua" en el marco de lo que se ha venido a denominar las "health humanities". Para finalizar, describimos dos prácticas creativas que en la actualidad están siendo evaluadas en España en el contexto de un proyecto de investigacióninternacional en recuperación mutua: Los seminarios creativos con personas con

show abstract

Cómo encontrar un lugar en el mundo: explorando experiencias de recuperación de personas con trastornos mentales graves

Cited by 13 publications

References 24 publications

Recovery From Severe Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review of Service User and Informal Caregiver Perspectives

Recovery From Severe Mental Health Problems: A Systematic Review of Service User and Informal Caregiver Perspectives

Recovery from severe mental health problems: A systematic review of service user and informal caregiver perspectives

La recuperación mutua en personas con trastornos psicológicos o diversidad funcional a través de la práctica creativa

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About