2011 SBMO/IEEE MTT-S International Microwave and Optoelectronics Conference (IMOC 2011) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/imoc.2011.6169247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compact, automatic set-up for ultra-weak photon emission measurements in organisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After acquiring basic knowledge of the daily rhythms present in UPE time profiles, a modified procedure was developed to better compare stressed and control samples: simultaneous experiments should be performed in similar setups (http://www.ft.unicamp.br/gallep/Gerais/setup.pdf) instead of sequential tests using the same equipment; the tested solution would not be added right at the beginning of the germination test but after 3 days of growth using distilled water and in the dark. With this approach the control and stressed samples exhibit UPE profiles that can be properly compared in time and in intensity, as demonstrated already for solutions (EC 50 and EC 100 ) of Hg and NaF .…”
Section: Recent Results: Lafa Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After acquiring basic knowledge of the daily rhythms present in UPE time profiles, a modified procedure was developed to better compare stressed and control samples: simultaneous experiments should be performed in similar setups (http://www.ft.unicamp.br/gallep/Gerais/setup.pdf) instead of sequential tests using the same equipment; the tested solution would not be added right at the beginning of the germination test but after 3 days of growth using distilled water and in the dark. With this approach the control and stressed samples exhibit UPE profiles that can be properly compared in time and in intensity, as demonstrated already for solutions (EC 50 and EC 100 ) of Hg and NaF .…”
Section: Recent Results: Lafa Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four series (sI, sII, sIII and sIV) were run using a home‐made apparatus [called PMT01, and described previously ], operating in photon‐counting mode with 10 4 acquisition points of 100 µs (counts per 100 µs). Briefly, the PMT01 photon‐count setup consists of a dark chamber connected to a photon‐count sensor based on a photomultiplier tube (H7360, Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu Photonics ‐ Hamamatsu City, Japan), a sample holder with temperature control, and an optical fiber ring connected to an external light source via an optical fiber + shutter, for controlled sample illumination.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three more series (UV1, UV2 and UV3) were run using UV at 365 nm LED excitation for 30 s (275 lux) and photon counts per milliseconds (cpms). After external light excitation, the shutter was closed and, after a constant time delay of 0.3 s, photon‐counting started, the signals being transferred to a computer via a USB interface . All FD tests were repeated five times for each sample, as well as for the CFDA‐SE solution (background).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental setup for DL tests are shown at Figure 1; it is a dark chamber with photon-count module (photomultiplier tube + electronics) and fiber optic ring connect to external light source (halogen lamp) by fiber cable and electricalmechanical shutter, all automatic controlled by software; it includes also temperature control for samples using fluid flow (Bertonha, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%