2006
DOI: 10.1157/13092766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparación de la flebotomía con eritrocitaféresis en la sobrecarga de hierro en portadores de mutaciones del gen HFE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method has been evaluated in 1 randomized 1 and a few nonrandomized studies. 2,3 Results from all show that erythrocytapheresis is a much more effective and faster method and removes at least twice as much iron per single procedure compared with phlebotomy. This is especially advantageous in situations of life-threatening organ complications because of iron overload as in this case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been evaluated in 1 randomized 1 and a few nonrandomized studies. 2,3 Results from all show that erythrocytapheresis is a much more effective and faster method and removes at least twice as much iron per single procedure compared with phlebotomy. This is especially advantageous in situations of life-threatening organ complications because of iron overload as in this case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Erythrocytapheresis of 350-800 ml of RBCs over several weeks is comparable with phlebotomy in adverse events and treatment costs [156,157]. The reduction in the number of required procedures per year to maintain a goal ferritin level may give a cost benefit of erythrocytapheresis over phlebotomy [158]. Erythrocytapheresis is a modality which has proven to reduce treatment duration of patients with iron overload from HH [159].…”
Section: Hereditary Hemochromatosis (Hh)mentioning
confidence: 99%