2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2014.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of architectures for monitoring cloud computing infrastructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After some testing it has been decided to follow a combined approach to be able to address some of the proposed metrics such as performance at resource level that with the push monitoring approach was impossible to get. Technically this implies the incorporation of pre-configured agents to be installed in the corresponding virtual machines, in what is called Extended Internal Adaptive Architecture (Alcaraz Calero and Gutiérrez Aguado, 2015). As the definition of the NFRs differ from one CSPs to others and being far of having a common approach, the set of metrics to assess the selected NFRs have been specifically defined for ACSmI.…”
Section: Acsmi Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After some testing it has been decided to follow a combined approach to be able to address some of the proposed metrics such as performance at resource level that with the push monitoring approach was impossible to get. Technically this implies the incorporation of pre-configured agents to be installed in the corresponding virtual machines, in what is called Extended Internal Adaptive Architecture (Alcaraz Calero and Gutiérrez Aguado, 2015). As the definition of the NFRs differ from one CSPs to others and being far of having a common approach, the set of metrics to assess the selected NFRs have been specifically defined for ACSmI.…”
Section: Acsmi Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%