2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of different boundary conditions and their influence on numerical hydrogeological modeling of Palmital watershed, southeast Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the solute transport results, the solute concentration filtered from the bottom of the aeration zone is taken as the vertical infiltration concentration [33,34] of the numerical model of Visual MODFLOW groundwater flow. The Hydrus-1D aeration zone model is divided into 16 regions for simulation, and the solute concentration at the bottom of each zone is different, so the solute transport model is divided into 16 regions with the input vertical infiltration concentration.…”
Section: • Vertical Penetration Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the solute transport results, the solute concentration filtered from the bottom of the aeration zone is taken as the vertical infiltration concentration [33,34] of the numerical model of Visual MODFLOW groundwater flow. The Hydrus-1D aeration zone model is divided into 16 regions for simulation, and the solute concentration at the bottom of each zone is different, so the solute transport model is divided into 16 regions with the input vertical infiltration concentration.…”
Section: • Vertical Penetration Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the conceptual model, the boundaries of the region are extended to obtain reasonable boundary conditions for the numerical model. Since the shallow groundwater of the Cebala perimeter belongs to a large catchment and is in interaction with the neighbouring aquifer systems, the definition of a reliable hydrogeological boundary condition is not feasible (Coelho et al, 2017;Follin & F I G U R E 2 Lithostratigraphic crosssections through Cebala perimeter Grundtenik, 1999;Frick et al, 2019;Woessner & Poeter, 2020). Thus, the modelled region was extended from the administrative boundaries of the perimeter in the west to the Mediterranean Sea in the east, and from the Medjerda River from the north to the piedmonts of the Nahli Mountain in the southern part.…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along the vertical direction, the model was built considering two layers with equal thicknesses and was run in a steady state condition considering an unconfined aquifer. The boundary conditions were defined according to the physical, hydraulic and hydrogeological features of the modeled area [39].…”
Section: Conceptual and Numerical Model Of Caposele Aquifermentioning
confidence: 99%