2016
DOI: 10.1080/14615517.2015.1075741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of enabling legislation for EIA follow-up in Lebanon, Palestine and Jordan (and Aqaba)

Abstract: The Middle East region has taken large strides in issuing legislations that protect the environment by using well-established tools such as environmental impact assessment and auditing. Ensuring compliance throughout the life cycles of development projects, however, remains a challenging task. This paper aims to show that despite the successes attained thus far, there are several drawbacks in the existing systems, most strikingly the weak linkages between the legal instruments such as EIA and auditing, the lac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have used the IAIA follow-up principles as the basis for analysis of EIA case studies or jurisdictional arrangements (e.g. Jha-Thakur et al, 2009;Nadeem and Hameed, 2010;Bashour, 2016). One paper specifically used the principles, together with other publications on EIA follow-up, as the basis for deriving a specific set of 'criteria for best practice follow-up' (Pinto et al, 2019, p1) and then using these criteria to test a case study development project.…”
Section: Reflections On the Framing Of The Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have used the IAIA follow-up principles as the basis for analysis of EIA case studies or jurisdictional arrangements (e.g. Jha-Thakur et al, 2009;Nadeem and Hameed, 2010;Bashour, 2016). One paper specifically used the principles, together with other publications on EIA follow-up, as the basis for deriving a specific set of 'criteria for best practice follow-up' (Pinto et al, 2019, p1) and then using these criteria to test a case study development project.…”
Section: Reflections On the Framing Of The Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%