Evolution of Nervous Systems 2017
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-804042-3.00043-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Receptor Types That Identify Primary Cortical Sensory Areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be confirmed for V1 in the present study by new measurements at different sites in the cortical areas and by a partly new sample of brains (Figure 2 ). A similar outcome for previously reported noradrenergic α 2 and serotonergic 5-HT 2 receptors in primary sensory areas (Zilles and Palomero-Gallagher, 2017 ) was also observed in the present study, again using a partly new sample of brains. Accordingly, the previously mentioned principal classifications of cortical areas as primary visual, unimodal visual or higher visual cortices (Caspers et al, 2015 ) is confirmed by the detection of characteristic levels of densities of single or several (fingerprints) receptor types in a brain-wide analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could be confirmed for V1 in the present study by new measurements at different sites in the cortical areas and by a partly new sample of brains (Figure 2 ). A similar outcome for previously reported noradrenergic α 2 and serotonergic 5-HT 2 receptors in primary sensory areas (Zilles and Palomero-Gallagher, 2017 ) was also observed in the present study, again using a partly new sample of brains. Accordingly, the previously mentioned principal classifications of cortical areas as primary visual, unimodal visual or higher visual cortices (Caspers et al, 2015 ) is confirmed by the detection of characteristic levels of densities of single or several (fingerprints) receptor types in a brain-wide analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Cortical layers—as defined in classical architectonic studies (Brodmann, 1909 ; von Economo and Koskinas, 1925 )—differ by cell types (Markram et al, 2004 ; Xu and Callaway, 2009 ; DeFelipe et al, 2013 ; Jiang et al, 2015 ), number or packing density of cells (von Economo and Koskinas, 1925 ; Haug et al, 1984 ; Zilles et al, 1986 ; Meyer et al, 2010 ), density of myelinated fibers (Vogt and Vogt, 1919 ; Annese et al, 2004 ), and densities of various transmitter receptors (e.g., Cortés et al, 1986 , 1987 ; Hoyer et al, 1986a , b ; Pazos et al, 1987a , b ; Jansen et al, 1989 ; Scheperjans et al, 2005a ; Eickhoff et al, 2008 ; Amunts et al, 2010 ; Vogt et al, 2013 ; Zilles and Palomero-Gallagher, 2017 ). For recent reviews see Nieuwenhuys ( 2013 ) and Zilles et al ( 2015b ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our new schematic map of the arcopallium/amygdala complex allows a more precise comparison of the receptor architecture to mammalian (pre)‐motor, other cortical as well as amygdala subregions. Although absolute densities of binding sites vary between different species, relative differences between regional densities are mostly comparable (Herold et al, ; Zilles & Palomero‐Gallagher, ). For example, in the (pre)‐motor regions of different mammalian species, NMDA and GABA A receptors showed the highest densities, and M 1 /α 1 receptors were higher expressed compared to M 2 /α 2 receptors (Gebhard et al, ; Geyer et al, ; Herold et al, ; Palomero‐Gallagher, Schleicher, Zilles, & Loscher, ; Palomero‐Gallagher & Zilles, ; Zilles et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although absolute densities of binding sites vary between different species, relative differences between regional densities are mostly comparable (Herold et al, 2015;Zilles & Palomero-Gallagher, 2016).…”
Section: General Comparisons Of the Avian Arcopallium Complex To Mamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation