Comparative assessment the subsidized housing using LEED, BREEAM and Greenship Neigborhood (Case study: Parung Panjang, West Java, Indonesia)

Abstract

Indonesia as a country with a large population has challenges in being able to provide housing that applies a sustainable concept but still has to be affordable for the community. Therefore, this research aims to compare the implementation of the three pillars of sustainability from several Neighborhood Sustainability Assessment. The method used in this research is a comparative analysis in assessing the concept of sustainable in subsidized housing and descriptive analysis to provide suggestions for improving the sustainable application in subsidized housing. The assessment carried out by the researchers using direct observation, masterplan interpretation and satellite photo interpretation. The results of the assessment using the Neighborhood Sustainability Assessment of several countries on subsidized housing for Perumnas Parung Panjang obtained silver level from LEED, pass level from BREEAM and bronze level from Greenship. On the other hand, from the aspect of the three pillars of sustainability, it is known that the economic pillars (36.27%) and the environmental pillars (32.14%) have a lower percentage of variable fulfilment compared to the social pillars (61.59%), so that several corrective steps are needed to maximize the application of the concept of sustainable and obtained a better NSA assessment score.

Residential Construction with a Focus on Evaluation of the Life Cycle of Buildings

“…The three basic pillars of building sustainability are considered: the environmental pillar, the economic pillar, and the social pillar [25][26][27]. Commonly used building rating certification systems (for example, LEED, BREEAM, WELL, DGNB, SBToolCZ) define a rather long list of criteria [28,29].…”