Comparative Clinical Study of a Bioabsorbable Membrane and Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Human Gingival Recession

Borghetti, A; Glise, Jean-Marc; Monnet‐Corti, Virginie; Déjou, Jacques

doi:10.1902/jop.1999.70.2.123

Cited by 91 publications

(105 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] Three RCTs reported the results from samples containing less than 10 patients per group at final examination, 13,35,36 two studies were classified as randomized non-controlled trials, 37,38 two presented a follow-up period <6 months, 39,40 two did not present a patientbased analysis 41,42 and one included recession areas containing teeth with restorations. 43 Of the 23 included studies, 5,12,15,44-63 fifteen had a splitmouth group study design 5,15,[44][45][46][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53]57,58,[60][61][62]63 and seventeen were conducted at university dental clinics 5,12,44,…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Can subepithelial connective tissue grafts be considered the gold standard procedure in the treatment of Miller Class I and II recession-type defects?

Chambrone

Pustiglioni

et al. 2008

Journal of Dentistry

225

213

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Can subepithelial connective tissue grafts be considered the gold standard procedure in the treatment of Miller Class I and II recession-type defects?

Chambrone

Pustiglioni

et al. 2008

Journal of Dentistry

225

213

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…2 Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the efficiency of the GTR procedure to treat gingival recessions. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Some other studies have also assessed histological periodontal regeneration, using or not resorbable membranes as barriers. 2,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Some clinical studies evaluated the combined use of membrane and bone graft in dehiscences; [19][20][21][22][23] however, there is still a lack of histological studies that evaluate the regenerative outcomes of the GTR procedure with the use of both membrane and bone graft.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Treatment of gingival recession with collagen membrane and DFDBA: a histometric study in dogs

Rosetti¹,

Marcantonio

Cirelli

et al. 2009

Braz. oral res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In a previous study, we evaluated the findings related to the use of resorbable collagen membranes in humans along with DFDBA (demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft). The aim of this subsequent study was to histometrically evaluate in dogs, the healing response of gingival recessions treated with collagen membrane + DFDBA (Guided Tissue Regeneration, GTR) compared to a coronally positioned flap (CPF). Two types of treatment were randomly carried out in a split-mouth study. Group 1 was considered as test (GTR: collagen membrane + DFDBA), whereas Group 2 stood for the control (only CPF). The dogs were given chemical bacterial plaque control with 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate during a 90-day repair period. Afterwards, the animals were killed to obtain biopsies and histometric evaluation of the process of cementum and bone formation, epithelial migration and gingival level. A statistically significant difference was found between groups with a larger extension of neoformed cementum (GTR = 32.72%; CPF = 18.82%; p = 0.0004), new bone (GTR = 23.20%; CPF = 09.90%; p = 0.0401) and with a smaller area of residual gingival recession in the test group (GTR = 50.69%; CPF = 59.73%; p = 0.0055) compared to the control group. The only item assessed that showed no statistical difference was epithelial proliferation on the root surface, with means of 15.14% for the GTR group and 20.34% for the CPF group (p = 0.0890). Within the limits of this study we concluded that the treatment of gingival recession defects with GTR, associating collagen membrane with DFDBA, showed better outcomes in terms of a larger extension of neoformed cementum and bone, as well as in terms of a smaller proportion of residual recessions.

show abstract

“…In spite of this, some authors believe that the connective tissue lying deeply on the palate may not assure full keratinization of the developing upper epithelium [9]. That is also why in methods of augmenting soft tissue of the alveolar process we distinguish 1) free connective tissue grafts of full and partial thickness and 2) pendunculated connective tissue grafts, e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A simple and established method of tissue culture of human gingival fibroblasts for gingival augmentation.

Saczko

Dominiak²,

Kulbacka³

et al. 2008

Folia Histochem Cytobiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent advances in tissue engineering technology suggest its application in different medical fields, including periodontology. There are some reports of new non-enzymatic methods of isolating human gingival fibroblast for short-time cultivation in vitro to be used in autologous gingival augmentation. The aim of this study was to obtain a simple and established method of culturing human gingival fibroblasts. The authors developed a recurrent method that can be successfully used in autologous gingival augmentation.

show abstract

Comparative Clinical Study of a Bioabsorbable Membrane and Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Human Gingival Recession

Cited by 91 publications

References 17 publications

Can subepithelial connective tissue grafts be considered the gold standard procedure in the treatment of Miller Class I and II recession-type defects?

Can subepithelial connective tissue grafts be considered the gold standard procedure in the treatment of Miller Class I and II recession-type defects?

Treatment of gingival recession with collagen membrane and DFDBA: a histometric study in dogs

A simple and established method of tissue culture of human gingival fibroblasts for gingival augmentation.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About