Comparative Clinical Trial Between Conventional Treatment and Treatment with Rich Plasma Implants in Platelets (PRP) in Patients with Pseudarthrosis in the Tibia

Abstract

The objective of this work was to carry out a comparative clinical study of the cost between the Conventional Treatment and the Treatment with Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) in patients with Pseudarthrosis in the Tibia. At human bone fractures, mainly at arising in accidents in traffic and others and your complications, represent one important condition what has jeopardized health and quality of life, in addition to crescents for the Unified Health System (SUS), so much in the treatment primary, how much of us care with their grievances. One there, the Pseudarthrosis, entity gives Orthopedics already quite known, it is one complication of fractures Where o bone no it presents features in consolidation and regeneration. This is mainly due to poor vascularization at the fracture site, inadequate or late treatment and follow-up of the fracture, or the presence of a gap between the bone fragments. Surgical treatment is the most common for Pseudoarthrosis and it may be necessary for the patient to have a vascularized bone graft in the affected region. Against in a scenery, in what if observe o increase in costs hospital at the treatment surgical of fractures, so as pension expenses at the costing in pensions and retirements, resulting in loss gives activity work and loss of Health and Quality of Life with great repercussion at economy of country, was performed a study with essay Clinical Cats Comparison of Treatment Surgical Conventional for Pseudarthrosis gives Tibia, with o use in new technologies like the injection in Plasma Rich in Platelets (PRP) at the focus gives referred lesion, in patients attended fur System single of Health (SUS). The results obtained demonstrate that treatment with Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) is less expensive, less traumatic, effective and allows for a shorter hospital stay, in addition to improving the Quality of Life.