2018
DOI: 10.1109/tec.2018.2837119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Design and Analysis of New Type of Flux-Intensifying Interior Permanent Magnet Motors With Different <italic>Q</italic>-Axis Rotor Flux Barriers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3, a high degree of freedom exists when designing a rotor for IPM machines with V‐shaped PMs. Investigated design parameters are chosen as a result of experience gained through numerous investigations and comprehensive literature [6–48]. On the other hand, other key parameters, such as stator outer diameter, stator slot geometry, shaft diameter, air‐gap length, D2, normalHRib and ws have not been considered in this paper because of these reasons: (i) their predicted obvious and/or insignificant effects (particularly due to the leakage flux); (ii) limited effects as a consequence of existing of mechanical constrains; (iii) their very limited range; (iv) not reasonable or possible to investigate its individual effect.…”
Section: Influences Of Design Parameters On Fw Performance Of Nsw Ipmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3, a high degree of freedom exists when designing a rotor for IPM machines with V‐shaped PMs. Investigated design parameters are chosen as a result of experience gained through numerous investigations and comprehensive literature [6–48]. On the other hand, other key parameters, such as stator outer diameter, stator slot geometry, shaft diameter, air‐gap length, D2, normalHRib and ws have not been considered in this paper because of these reasons: (i) their predicted obvious and/or insignificant effects (particularly due to the leakage flux); (ii) limited effects as a consequence of existing of mechanical constrains; (iii) their very limited range; (iv) not reasonable or possible to investigate its individual effect.…”
Section: Influences Of Design Parameters On Fw Performance Of Nsw Ipmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steady state and FW performance characteristics of IPM machines are primarily affected by magnetic design, depending on stator/rotor topology and excitation, and sophisticated FW control techniques. From magnetic design point of view, extensively employed performance improvement methods, particularly for FW operation, are classified as follows: Winding topologies [10–16]; PM layer number, shape and position [17–23]; Flux barrier configuration and position [24–29]; PM segmentation [19, 30–34]; PM skewing [35–38]; Novel rotor topology [39–41]; Rotor shape optimisation [42–45]; Other techniques, such as excitation, axial lamination, damper bars and so on [31, 46–48]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L q -L d is a positive value as the phase current below 263 A and then is negative with the further growth of the phase current, which is much different from conventional three-phase PMSM. It means that the modular three-phase PMSM can run with a positive d-axis current (i d ), which is beneficial to realize the flux-intensifying effect and reduce the demagnetization risk of the module three-phase PMSM under the high current amplitude condition or the condition that the motor frequently starts [25,26]. Figure 14 depicts that the d-q axis inductances of motor unit 1 with different phase current con tions varied from 0 to 400 A. Additionally, the inductance difference between Lq and Ld is also in stigated.…”
Section: Winding Inductance Characteristices Of Modular Three-phase Pmsmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, in Type 2, the d-axis armature flux and PM flux are in the same direction and then the d-axis flux is intensified. The motors that employ flux intensifying such as the Type 2 ones have been called the flux intensifying IPMSM [38,40,41]. However, in this paper, less PM is used for the rotor with a dominant reluctance torque, and therefore they should still be considered as a kind of SynRMs.…”
Section: Demagnetization Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%