2022
DOI: 10.2174/1567205019666220120112301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of Cholinesterase Inhibitors and Memantine Based on Dosage in Patients with Vascular Cognitive Impairment: A Network Meta-analysis

Abstract: Background: Considering the lack of direct comparison between cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in patients with vascular cognitive impairment (VCI), determining how to choose the best treatment plan remains inconclusive. Hence, we conducted the network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and acceptability of these drugs. Methods: PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase and Web of Science were searched for double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for the treatment o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In all, 31 studies were excluded due to the following reasons: samples overlap with other studies ( n = 7), no necessary sample data ( n = 10), other outcomes ( n = 4), other PSCI ( n = 3), not written in English ( n = 4), and no placebo group ( n = 3) ( Figure 1 ). Thus, 19 studies were included in the umbrella review: Kim and Kang, (2020) , Guekht et al (2017) , Kwon (2019) , Huang et al (2021) , Tan (2015) , Jin and Liu (2019) , Shi et al (2022) , Lopez-Arrieta and Birks (2002) , Fan (2021) , Yi et al (2020) , Alvarez-Sabín. (2013) , Huahui and Hehua (2015) , Malykh and Sadaie (2010) , Ming (2016) , NanZhu et al (2018) , Wei (2020) , You et al (2019) , Szatmári and Whitehouse (2009) , Szatmari and Whitehouse (2003) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all, 31 studies were excluded due to the following reasons: samples overlap with other studies ( n = 7), no necessary sample data ( n = 10), other outcomes ( n = 4), other PSCI ( n = 3), not written in English ( n = 4), and no placebo group ( n = 3) ( Figure 1 ). Thus, 19 studies were included in the umbrella review: Kim and Kang, (2020) , Guekht et al (2017) , Kwon (2019) , Huang et al (2021) , Tan (2015) , Jin and Liu (2019) , Shi et al (2022) , Lopez-Arrieta and Birks (2002) , Fan (2021) , Yi et al (2020) , Alvarez-Sabín. (2013) , Huahui and Hehua (2015) , Malykh and Sadaie (2010) , Ming (2016) , NanZhu et al (2018) , Wei (2020) , You et al (2019) , Szatmári and Whitehouse (2009) , Szatmari and Whitehouse (2003) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, 10 mg of donepezil has a significantly higher risk of discontinuation related to adverse reactions than a 5-mg dose of donepezil. 5 In China, traditional Chinese medicine is one of the most important supplementary treatments for patients with vascular dementia. 6 Many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that Chinese patent medicines or Chinese herbal extracts can further improve the cognitive abilities and dementia symptoms of vascular dementia patients in combination with donepezil treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, there is no FDA approved drug for the treatment of VaD. Several AD drugs, such as cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine, were evaluated in clinical trials of VaD, but only marginal positive outcomes were obtained [8][9][10][11]. Altogether, the current situation of pharmacotherapy for SD remains unsatisfactory and requires further development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%