Comparative Efficacy of Certain Bio-Pesticides against  Tomato Fruit Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.)

Choudhary, Renu; Kumar, Ashwani; Jat, Gajanand; ram, Vik; Deshwal, H.L.

doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2017.608.133

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nisco sixer plus is found to be the next effective treatment which is in line with the findings of Barwa andKumar [7] and Lalhluzuala and Kumar [13]. Neem oil 5% is found to be the next effective treatment which isin line with the findings of Gautam et al, [14] and Bhati et al [15]. NSKE is found to be the next effective treatment which is in line with the findings of Pachundkar et al, 2013.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 85%

Evaluation of Selected Biopesticides with Chlorantraniliprole against Chickpea Pod Borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] at Prayagraj, India

Kumar¹,

Kumar²

2023

IJECC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The research work entitled was undertaken at central research farm (CRF) SHUATS, Naini, Prayagraj consists of eight treatments viz, T1- Spinosad 45% SC, T2- Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC, T3- Half dose of Chlorantraniliprole + Nisco sixer plus, T4- Nisco sixer plus, T5- NSKE, T6- Beauveria bassiana,T7- Neem oil and T0- untreated control in RBD with three replications. The larval population of chickpea pod borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)]on third, seventh and fourteen days after spraying revealed that the treatment Chlorantraniliprole (2.41) found superior followed by Spinosad 45%SC (2.47), Half dose of Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC + Nisco sixer plus (2.61), Nisco sixer plus (2.67), Neem oil (2.72), NSKE (2.76) and Beauveria bassiana (3.60) as compared to control(4.67). Among the treatments studied, the best and most economical treatment was Chlorantraniliprole (1:3.0), followed by Spinosad 45%SC (1:2.6), Half dose of Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC + Nisco sixer plus (1:2.2), Nisco sixer plus (1:1.8), Neem oil (1:1.7), NSKE (1:1.5) and Beauveria bassiana (1:1.1) as compared to control (1:1.0).

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 85%

Evaluation of Selected Biopesticides with Chlorantraniliprole against Chickpea Pod Borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] at Prayagraj, India

Kumar¹,

Kumar²

2023

IJECC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In India, it has been observed to feed on 181 cultivated and uncultivated species belonging to 45 families. H. armigera is found in the Palearctic, Oriental, Ethiopian and Australian provinces, south of a line at approximately 52 0 N. This range occupied by the species includes tropical, dry and temperate climates" Choudhary et al [4][5][6][7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy of Selected Biopesticides with Chlorantraniliprole against Gram Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Chickpea

Dayma,

Tayde,

Tripathi

2024

UPJOZ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present investigation was conducted at the research plot of Department of Entomology at CRF, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj during the Rabi season of 2023-2024. The experiment was conducted in Randomized Block Design (RBD) using eight treatments each replicated thrice viz., Neem oil 2 % @20ml/lit, Spinosad 45 % SC @0.3ml/lit, NSKE 5% @5ml/lit., Bacillus thurngiensis @2.5 gm/lit, Beauveria bassiana @2.5gm/lit, Emamectin benzoate 5%SG @2ml/lit, Chlorantraniliprole18.5 S @1.5ml/lit and untreated control. Among the biopesticides and insecticides evaluated, Chlorantraniliprole 18.5 SC recorded lowest mean population of pod borer population i.e. (1.79) which was significantly superior over control followed by Spinosad 45 % SC (2.02%), Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (2.23%), Neem oil 2% (2.41%), NSKE 5% SC (2.61%), Bacillus thurngiensis (1.83%) and Beauveria bassiana (2.99%) was least effective among all the treatments. Among the treatment studied the best and most economical treatment was Chlorantraniliprole 18.5SC with highest and cost benefit ratio of 28.3 q/h and 1:3.1 followed by Spinosad 45 % SC %SC 26.7 q/h, 1:3.0, Emamectin benzoate 5%SG 25.8q/h and 1:2.9, Neem oil 2 % 22.5 q/h, 1:2.4, NSKE 5% 21.2 q/h , 1:2.2, Bacillus thurngiensis 17.0 q/h, and 1:1.9, Beauveria bassiana 11.7 q/h, and1:1.2 as compared to control 9.3 q/h and 1:1.1.

show abstract

“…Apart from pigeonpea, various field crops are also affected by H. armigera , with losses ranging from 26‐80%. Cereals like rice (37%), maize (31%), corn, pearl millet and chickpea (26%), oil crops like cotton (37–65%) (Aheer, Ali, & Akram, 2009; Honnakerappa & Udikeri, 2018), vegetables like tomato (37–80%) (Choudhary, Kumar, Jat, Ram, & Deshwal, 2017), potato (40%), okra, soybeans field beans, peas (26–29%), (Abhilash & Shekharappa, 2017) and fruits like, citrus are profoundly affected by this pest. Various pest control measures such as chemical insecticides (Babariya, Kabaria, Patel, & Joshi, 2010; Pathange & Chiranjeevi, 2017), new generation microbial agents ( Trichoderma viride and Bacillus megatherium ) and bio‐pesticides (Gajendran, Chandrasekaran, & Jebaraj, 2006; Sharma et al, 2015) have not been successful in controlling this pest.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Secondary genepool of Australian Cajanus species contains sources of resistance to Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner)

Vanambathina

Henry

Rachaputi

et al. 2021

Annals of Applied Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A narrow genetic base in cultivated pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) limits the host plant resistance (HPR) to the devastating pest Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Earlier research on pod borer resistance in wild Cajanus relatives has mainly explored the tertiary genepool, making breeding for resistance difficult because of linkage drag. Previous investigations on a wide range of Australian native germplasm from the secondary and tertiary gene pools revealed resistance in the secondary gene pool, associated with total phenolic content (TPC). This study reports the application of the extreme phenotype genome‐wide association (XP‐GWAS) to associate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with resistance traits. Mapping of 19 accessions, including 12 wild accessions to a reference pigeonpea genome have identified a total of 16,489 and 16,227 nonsynonymous SNPs for the resistance and TPC traits, respectively. These SNPs were subjected to functional analysis, and KEGG pathway analysis revealed the presence of candidate genes coding for the crucial enzymes in five defence‐related pathways that could be contributing to resistance. These pathways involve ‘Jasmonic acid synthesis’ (palmitoyl‐CoA hydrolase, phospholipase A1 and phospholipase A2), ‘insect hormone biosynthesis’ (aldehyde dehydrogenase) ‘Steroid biosynthesis’ (squalene monooxygenase, farnesyl transferase and lanosterol synthase), ‘Cutin, suberine and wax synthesis’ (O‐acyltransferase) and ‘Brassinosteroid biosynthesis’ (Det2). Analysis of SNPs associated with the TPC trait led to the identification of a divergent pathway of ‘secondary metabolite synthesis’ (flavonoid 3′ hydroxylase, l‐rhamnosyltransferase) in wild Cajanus species consistent with a high concentration of isoorientin and the possible presence of its derivative maysin; a strong insecticidal compound in leaves.

show abstract

Comparative Efficacy of Certain Bio-Pesticides against Tomato Fruit Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.)

Abstract: The field experiment on "Comparative efficacy of certain bio-pesticides against tomato fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hub.

Cited by 4 publications

References 3 publications

Evaluation of Selected Biopesticides with Chlorantraniliprole against Chickpea Pod Borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] at Prayagraj, India

Evaluation of Selected Biopesticides with Chlorantraniliprole against Chickpea Pod Borer [Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)] at Prayagraj, India

Efficacy of Selected Biopesticides with Chlorantraniliprole against Gram Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Chickpea

Secondary genepool of Australian Cajanus species contains sources of resistance to Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About