2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of ageing effects on the properties of regular and highly polymer modified asphalt binders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The growing demand for freight transport in the road modal has promoted new technologies and improved materials to improve the mechanical response, performance, and durability of asphalt coating layers ( 1 , 2 ). In road modal, the current state of the paving industry demands better quality asphalt binders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growing demand for freight transport in the road modal has promoted new technologies and improved materials to improve the mechanical response, performance, and durability of asphalt coating layers ( 1 , 2 ). In road modal, the current state of the paving industry demands better quality asphalt binders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen in this study, each performance test and binder characteristic showed a different ranking of binders and there is no clear method in identifying a recommended rejuvenator combination. Recent literature has used performance diagrams to identify better performing asphalt binders (50,51). Performance diagrams include several different parameters that are plotted simultaneously.…”
Section: Overall Comparison Of Rejuvenator Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance diagram in this study contained eight parameters—R-value, crossover temperature, G-R, LPG Cont , HPG Cont , ΔT c , carbonyl index, and sulfoxide index—as the goal of this study was to assess the susceptibility of rejuvenated RAP binders to aging. Therefore, all parameters, except HPG Cont and LPG Cont , were taken as the change in performance between the RTFO and PAV40 aging levels, which is similar to methods used to assess aging in literature ( 50 ). As mentioned previously, all the combinations were scaled to be values between 0.0 and 1.0 following Equation 3.…”
Section: Overall Comparison Of Rejuvenator Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many studies available investigated the effects of modified asphalt containing waste plastics at various dosages on its properties and pavement performance. The dosage range of common polymer-modified asphalt is between 2.5 wt% and 3.5 wt%, with a higher dose range greater than 7 wt% being referred to as highly modified asphalt [ 115 ]. Mashaan et al [ 28 ] reported that the ideal content of waste plastic is 6–8 wt% to improve the rutting and aging resistances of modified asphalt.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Properties Of Waste Plastic-modified Asphaltmentioning
confidence: 99%