2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of filtration and imaging properties of analytical filters for microplastic capture and analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some filters can also be cost prohibitive (i.e., aluminum oxide filters). Silicon nanomembranes avoid many of the disadvantages of the other filter types as they have smaller and consistent pore sizes (increased porosity), a wide range of pore selection and are inert and inorganic; however, they can be cost prohibitive and fragile (Carter et al, 2023;Madejski et al, 2020).…”
Section: Current Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some filters can also be cost prohibitive (i.e., aluminum oxide filters). Silicon nanomembranes avoid many of the disadvantages of the other filter types as they have smaller and consistent pore sizes (increased porosity), a wide range of pore selection and are inert and inorganic; however, they can be cost prohibitive and fragile (Carter et al, 2023;Madejski et al, 2020).…”
Section: Current Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membrane materials are crucial to nano-/microplastics’ separating properties and scale application. Generally, polymeric membranes and ceramic membranes are widely used in the removal of nano-/microplastics from water [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. In a study conducted by Xu et al [ 23 ], both polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and polyethersulfone (PES) membranes were utilized for the extraction of microplastics from lake water, achieving an impressive removal rate of 92%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%