Comparative Evaluation of Granules Made with Different Binders by a Fluidized Bed Method

Abstract

Granules were prepared using three different binders, pregelatinized starch (PGS), gelatin (GEL), and polyvinylpyrrolidone (K30) by a fluidized bed method. As a quantitative measurement of mechanical strength or abrasion resistance, granules were subjected to a friability test for certain periods of time, and friability indexes (FI) as a function of time were calculated. The data obtained were analyzed by applying standard mathematical models. According to the derived parameters of the logistic and Weibull models, which fit best to the data, mechanical strength of granules made with K30 was observed to be lower than that of the granules of PGS and GEL which have similar values of model parameters. Flow properties, consolidation, and compressibility behaviors of unfriabled (UFR) and friabled (FR) granules, which were selected based upon their Weibull time parameter, were investigated as comparative. The flow rate of granules decreased due to diminishing particle size depending on binder type and friability, but the values of angle of repose were within the acceptable limits. Regarding consolidation behavior, the change of relative density vs. the number of taps, i.e., packing rate for FR granules of GEL was slower than that of its UFR form, whereas FR granules of PGS and K30 showed faster change in relative density compared to their UFR forms. According to the parameters obtained from the Heckel equation, PGS and K30 were found to produce softer, more plastic and readily deformable granules than GEL, and the compressibility of their FR forms was not influenced negatively.

Physicochemical Characterization and Evaluation of the Binding Effect of Acacia etbaica Schweinf Gum in Granule and Tablet Formulations

“…Hausner's ratios were also observed to be less than 1.25, which also confirmed excellent flow property of the granules. Excellent flow property of the granule is necessary to ensure efficient mixing and acceptable weight uniformity in compressed tablets [27]. 4.9.2.…”