2013
DOI: 10.3906/vet-1303-26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of liquid-phase blocking ELISA and solid-phase competition ELISA methods for the detection of antibodies to the structural proteins of foot-and-mouth disease types O and A viruses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The internationally accepted methods for the detection of antibody response after vaccination are virus neutralization test (VNT), LPB-ELISA and solid phase competition ELISA [ 10 ]. In the present study, LPB-ELISA was standardized and used for antigenic characterization of CSFV isolates and compared the result with neutralization peroxidase linked assay (NPLA) and both the tests showed positive correlation [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internationally accepted methods for the detection of antibody response after vaccination are virus neutralization test (VNT), LPB-ELISA and solid phase competition ELISA [ 10 ]. In the present study, LPB-ELISA was standardized and used for antigenic characterization of CSFV isolates and compared the result with neutralization peroxidase linked assay (NPLA) and both the tests showed positive correlation [ 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several specific ELISAs for detecting the non-structural proteins (NSP) of FMDV such as Mab trapping (MAT) ELISA and blocking ELISA for detecting of antibodies against 3ABC-NSP (Sorensen et al, 1998). Currently, competitive-ELISA is used for detecting NSP-FMD antibodies and this serological test is more sensitive and rapid than the virus neutralization test (Sevik and Ozturk, 2013). In addition, RT-PCR technique has become established as a confirmatory test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All data for nodes P2 and P3 were collected from the Russian Federation Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance. The minimum and maximum values for diagnostic sensitivity were taken from a study of virus detection using ELISA (P4) [ 40 , 41 ]. Referring to the international standards (AS/NZS ISO 31,000:2009 Risk management - principles and guidelines), combined with the risk identification, analysis and evaluation methods and risk management process proposed in Chinese national standards (GB/T27921-2011 Risk management - Risk assessment techniques), a semi-quantitative model of FMD positive cattle export caused by the failure of Russian control measures was established.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%